• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
TechCable Companies

7 Horrible Rip-Offs by Cable Companies Were Exposed This Week

By
Brad Tuttle
Brad Tuttle
and
TIME
TIME
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Brad Tuttle
Brad Tuttle
and
TIME
TIME
Down Arrow Button Icon
June 25, 2016, 10:56 AM ET
Man using TV Remote Control
Photograph by GregorBister Getty Images

It probably wasn’t necessary to conduct a federal investigation to find out that America’s cable companies routinely mistreat and rip off customers. Within the past week, after all, yet another survey confirmed that American consumers despise Time Warner Cable, Comcast, and basically the entire cable-Internet complex—an industry that always ranks lowest in customer satisfaction ratings.

All the complaints couldn’t be ignored forever by our leaders in Washington, and this week the results of a U.S. Senate investigation led by Sen. Rob Portman (R., Ohio) and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri) were released in a report entitled “Some Cable and Satellite Companies Do Not Refund Customer Overcharges.” While the focus of that report was fairly narrow, and only covered but one aspect of why cable companies infuriate customers, a Senate hearing that followed the report exposed many other problems customers have with their cable companies. McCaskill also issued her own report on the subject, targeting bad customer service and faulty billing by the cable companies. Altogether, the research shows several of the most hated cable company practices–which are probably depressingly familiar to cable customers.

Overcharging customers. Let’s start with the focus of the main report, which showed that Time Warner Cable and Charter Communications—which will soon merge and become one company—are guilty of widespread overbilling for equipment, programming, and assorted other fees. TWC will overcharge customers around $2 million in 2016, according to the Senate report’s estimate, while Charter admitted it has been overcharging customers to the tune of $443,000 per month.

For more on cable and streaming, watch:

No effort to rein in overcharges. “Time Warner Cable and Charter made no effort to trace equipment overcharges to their origin unless customers specifically asked them to and did not provide notice or refunds to customers,” the Senate report found. (Comcast and DirecTV, by contrast, have policies in place to automatically check that charges are correct and refund overcharges.) In the hearing, a TWC executive justified its policy by way of saying that some customers underpay, and therefore it supposedly sort of evens out, the Consumerist reported.

Refusal to do what the customer asks. This one will be no surprise whatsoever to anyone who has called their pay TV provider to request a lower price or simply cancel the service. Basically, customer “service” agents are on a mission to talk the customer out of either option. “As stated in a Time Warner Cable training document, the goal of the retention agent was to ‘do the opposite of what the customer is calling for. If the customer is calling in to cancel, your goal is to not cancel the services!’” the report stated, according to the Wall Street Journal. Mind you, all telecom companies work this way, not just TWC. “And if the customer wants to lower the bill, you’re going to try to avoid that, and perhaps even raise the bill!”

Cable Cord-Cutting Reaches One in Five U.S. Households

Failure to tell people how much they’ll really pay. The annoying customer service practice mentioned above would rarely be necessary if another hated practice wasn’t the standard. We’re talking about the business’s pricing structure, in which customers are enticed in with low introductory prices that inevitably will be jacked up much higher down the road. How much higher? Many customers now know that within three years of signing up they can be easily be charged 50% more than their intro rate, assuming they don’t call up to complain and demand a better price. But it’s often impossible to tell how much their cable company will try to charge them for service down the road.

Essentially, cable companies “figure out a way to make the entry price as low as possible; figure out how to roll people off that entry price as quickly as you can, and then deal with their anger once the price has gone up,” McCaskill said at the hearing. She then asked a panel of telecom representatives, “Do any of you advertise the price after the promotion?” No one answered, according to Consumerist.

Impossible to find out what the best deal is. “Customer service representatives at DirecTV were told to only offer the lowest price option ‘if [they] will lose the sale,’ as this package was only used as an option for customers who were considering cancelling service,” McCaskill’s report explained. “Similarly, customer service representatives at DirecTV, Time Warner Cable, Comcast, and Charter were instructed to first attempt to sell customers higher priced packages before moving to less expensive options based on the customers’ reactions.”

The websites of companies like Comcast (CMCSA), Charter (CHTR), and Dish (DISH) either don’t list the truly lowest price service option, or make it nearly impossible to find it, so the typical customer is in the dark about whether or not they’re being offered a good deal.

How the Cable Industry Became a Monopoly

Overcharging on fees just because they can. Often, fees that aren’t advertised are added to cable customer bills, and the rate at which they’re charged have nothing to do with costs incurred by provider. Instead, they are “set according to the company’s overall revenue goals, taking into account what the market will bear, and sometimes considering cost, while also focusing on the customer’s willingness to pay for a certain service or piece of equipment,” McCaskill’s report stated.

Failure to automatically refund nonsensical fees. McCaskill mentioned in her report that she personally called up her cable provider a couple years ago complaining about an unnecessary $10 charge. “I learned that I was paying a fee that the company was no longer charging its newer customers and that the company would immediately remove the charge on my bill. I also learned that the only way that I could have known about this and gotten the fee removed was to do exactly what I did and call the company,” she said, according to USA Today. “Had it been up to the company, I would have been paying that fee forever.”

This article originally appeared on Time.com

About the Authors
By Brad Tuttle
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
By TIME
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Tech

Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025

Most Popular

Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • Facebook icon
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  • Instagram icon
  • Pinterest icon

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
North America
'I meant what I said in Davos': Carney says he really is planning a Canada split with the U.S. along with 12 new trade deals
By Rob Gillies and The Associated PressJanuary 28, 2026
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
C-Suite
Fortune 500 CEOs are no longer giving employees an A for effort. Now they want proof of impact
By Claire ZillmanJanuary 28, 2026
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Every U.S. Olympian is going home with $200,000, whether they medal or not, thanks to a billionaire's $100 million gift
By Jacqueline MunisJanuary 28, 2026
23 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
The American taxpayer spent nearly half a billion dollars deploying federal troops to U.S. cities in 2025, CBO finds
By Nick LichtenbergJanuary 28, 2026
24 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Real Estate
Ryan Serhant thinks the American Dream was just a 'slogan created by banks,' but it was really about FDR, the Great Depression, and an economic crisis
By Sydney Lake and Nick LichtenbergJanuary 26, 2026
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
C-Suite
Jeff Bezos capped his Amazon salary at $80,000: ‘How could I possibly need more incentive?’
By Sydney LakeJanuary 28, 2026
1 day ago

© 2026 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.


Latest in Tech

Claude 4 illustration
AIAnthropic
AI writes 100% of the code at Anthropic, OpenAI top engineers say—with big implications for the future of software development jobs
By Beatrice NolanJanuary 29, 2026
57 minutes ago
TikTok influencer Khaby Lame sits and talks.
AISocial Media
Getting deported by Trump can’t stop top influencer Khaby Lame from notching a $975 million deal—including the rights to his AI avatar
By Jake AngeloJanuary 29, 2026
2 hours ago
NewslettersEye on AI
AI has made hacking cheap. That changes everything for business
By Sharon GoldmanJanuary 29, 2026
3 hours ago
Microsoft Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella (L), speaks with OpenAI Chief Executive Officer Sam Altman, who joined by video during the Microsoft Build 2025, conference in Seattle, Washington on May 19, 2025.
Big TechOpenAI
Microsoft’s $440 billion wipeout, and investors angry about OpenAI’s debt, explained
By Eva RoytburgJanuary 29, 2026
3 hours ago
AILetter from London
Struggling to remain relevant during the AI water-cooler chat? Talk about your latest “new collar” hire 
By Kamal AhmedJanuary 29, 2026
4 hours ago
brin
Real EstateBillionaires
Sergey Brin makes his biggest donation ever to tackle California’s housing crisis, weeks after moving to the Nevada side of Lake Tahoe
By Nick LichtenbergJanuary 29, 2026
4 hours ago