• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Commentary

Sorry, Trump: You’re Not Getting Sanders’ Voters

By
Matt Levendusky
Matt Levendusky
and
Bethany Cianciolo
Bethany Cianciolo
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Matt Levendusky
Matt Levendusky
and
Bethany Cianciolo
Bethany Cianciolo
Down Arrow Button Icon
June 11, 2016, 10:00 AM ET
Presumptive Republican Nominee Donald Trump Speaks At The Road To Majority Conference
Donald Trump, president and chief executive of Trump Organization Inc. and presumptive Republican presidential nominee, pauses while speaking during Faith and Freedom Coalitions Road to Majority conference in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Friday, June 10, 2016. McConnell said yesterday that Donald Trump needs to pick an experienced running mate because he doesn't know a lot about the issues and strongly urged him to change course on his rhetoric. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty ImagesPhotograph by Andrew Harrer — Bloomberg via Getty Images

Now that Hillary Clinton has enough delegate support to become the presumptive Democratic nominee, many have asked where Bernie Sanders’ supporters will turn—in particular, whether they’ll support the other outsider in the race, Donald Trump. Some polls certainly suggest so: A recent YouGov/The Economist poll finds that 48% of Sanders supporters don’t plan on supporting Clinton in the general election, including 19% who say that they will vote for Trump. Such numbers no doubt fill the hearts of many Republicans with glee, hoping that they can attract enough disaffected Sanders voters to launch Trump into the White House. But come November, many Sanders voters will ultimately side with Clinton.

One can certainly make a case for why Sanders’ supporters would go to Trump: Both are political outsiders who have shaken up the establishment in their respective parties. Both have similar messages on the rigged political and economic system, especially on issues such as trade. Both have harnessed the anger in the 2016 political zeitgeist. From that perspective, Trump’s recent overtures to the Sanders coalition make sense.

But the current polling overstates Trump’s appeal to Sanders supporters. On a whole host of issues, Trump and Sanders take starkly different positions. It’s hard to imagine a Sanders supporter agreeing with Trump’s positions on immigration, the minimum wage, taxes, gun control, or global warming. Even if that Sanders voter appreciated Trump’s opposition to trade, his stances on these others issues would likely be a bitter pill to swallow.

In the 2008 election, many of Clinton’s supporters vowed not to support Obama, calling themselves PUMAs (for party unity my a**). According to a Gallup poll on the eve of the 2008 Democratic Convention, only 47% of Clinton’s primary supporters were sure they would vote for Obama. Yet, after the dust settled, post-election surveys found that the overwhelming majority of them supported Obama, especially if they lived in key battleground states.

Why did Clinton’s primary supporters ultimately decide to back Obama? It comes down to the dynamics of a primary vs. a general election campaign. In the primary, the debate was over the differences between Clinton and Obama. But once Obama won the Democratic nomination, the contest turned to Obama vs. McCain. While there were differences between Clinton and Obama, they were dwarfed by the differences between Obama and McCain. Facing that choice in the general election, those voters decided to pull the lever for Obama.

In the end, 2016 will look similar for many of Sanders’ supporters: Faced with a choice between Clinton and Trump, many will go to Clinton’s side. Right now, at the end of a long and hard-fought primary election, Sanders’ supporters can easily call to mind all of the reasons they dislike Clinton. Indeed, many Sanders supporters’ self-proclaimed support for Trump at this point likely reflects the long Democratic primary, which has highlighted the few areas where Clinton and Sanders disagree (recall that in the Senate, they voted together 93% of the time). After working to defeat Clinton, it seems difficult to turn around now and support her.

But as the party coalesces around Clinton in the weeks and months ahead, Sanders supporters will be reminded of all they have in common with her. Recent endorsements by key Democrats like Elizabeth Warren and Obama will help with that process. Sanders supporters will remember all of the places where they agree with Clinton, and equally important, the many areas where they disagree—often vociferously—with Trump.

 

In particular, Sanders’ more liberal or Democratic supporters will be especially likely to support Clinton in the fall. Or if they do defect, it will likely be to someone like Green Party candidate Jill Stein. These voters will reason that a Clinton presidency is preferable to a Trump one, even if they would most prefer a Sanders presidency. Especially given that Sanders has pledged to work with the Clinton campaign to defeat Trump in November, many such voters will ultimately back Clinton.

But Clinton faces a more uphill climb with other Sanders supporters. While the stereotypical Sanders voter is on the far left, in actuality, a good deal of his support comes from independents and moderates (and the two groups need not be the same). A recent analysis of NBC News polling data shows that many of these voters have a strong antipathy toward Clinton. Winning them over will be harder, as they enter the general election season with negative views of Clinton. But harder need not mean impossible, especially if she can convince them that Trump is temperamentally unsuited to the presidency. Whether she can effectively do that in the coming months will be one of her challenges to winning in November.

Matthew Levendusky is associate professor of political science at the University of Pennsylvania. He is the author of The Partisan Sort (University of Chicago Press, 2009), How Partisan Media Polarize American (University of Chicago Press, 2013), and the co-author (with James Q. Wilson, John DiIulio, and Meena Bose) of American Government: Institutions and Policies, 15th ed (Cengage Learning, 2016).

About the Authors
By Matt Levendusky
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
By Bethany Cianciolo
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Commentary

Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025

Most Popular

Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Fortune Secondary Logo
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Features
  • Leadership
  • Health
  • Commentary
  • Success
  • Retail
  • Mpw
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
  • CEO Initiative
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Conferences
  • Europe
  • Newsletters
  • Personal Finance
  • Environment
  • Magazine
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
  • Group Subscriptions
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • Facebook icon
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  • Instagram icon
  • Pinterest icon

Latest in Commentary

fauci
CommentaryCOVID-19 vaccines
How COVID turned America against science — and what it will take to win it back
By David Blumenthal and James A. MoroneMarch 24, 2026
12 hours ago
alex
Commentarydisruption
AI’s disruption is a choice, not a forecast
By Alex StephanyMarch 24, 2026
13 hours ago
trump
Commentarynational debt
The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it
By Steve H. Hanke and David M. WalkerMarch 23, 2026
1 day ago
kuo
CommentaryUnicorns
Alibaba.com President: The one-person unicorn is coming. AI is making it possible
By Kuo ZhangMarch 23, 2026
2 days ago
gen z
CommentaryGen Z
Gen Z is using ChatGPT to practice salary negotiations and tough conversations before they happen
By Phillip MillerMarch 22, 2026
2 days ago
world
CommentaryCapitalism
Our economy has been living in an Adam Smith world since 1776. Something different is coming
By Ravi ChaudhryMarch 22, 2026
2 days ago

Most Popular

Commentary
The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it
By Fortune EditorsMarch 23, 2026
1 day ago
Personal Finance
Current price of gold as of March 23, 2026
By Fortune EditorsMarch 23, 2026
1 day ago
Economy
It took 200 years for national debt to hit $1 trillion. Annual interest alone now exceeds that—a 'crushing legacy we must reverse,' says budget chair
By Fortune EditorsMarch 23, 2026
1 day ago
Economy
Larry Fink says today's economic anxiety stems from people increasingly feeling like capitalism isn't working for them
By Fortune EditorsMarch 23, 2026
1 day ago
Personal Finance
Current price of silver as of Tuesday, March 24, 2026
By Fortune EditorsMarch 24, 2026
9 hours ago
Personal Finance
Current price of oil as of March 23, 2026
By Fortune EditorsMarch 23, 2026
1 day ago

© 2026 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.