• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
FinanceGlencore

Glencore rushes to calm investors after surprise stock plunge

By
Cyrus Sanati
Cyrus Sanati
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Cyrus Sanati
Cyrus Sanati
Down Arrow Button Icon
October 1, 2015, 10:08 AM ET
Anibal Contreras clears slag at the Altonorte metallurgical facility, north Chile
Anibal Contreras clears slag at the Altonorte metallurgical facility, north ChileCourtesy of Glencore

Glencore officials met with a number of senior credit fund managers in London on Wednesday in a bid to reassure the investment community that the commodities-trading and mining conglomerate was indeed solvent and that it was also making strong headway in reducing the firm’s massive debt load, Fortune has learned.

Company officials told the two dozen or so fund managers in attendance that it had also entered into negotiations with an unnamed sovereign wealth fund to buy a small stake in the company’s agriculture business worth around $2 billion.

The Glencore officials assured the fund managers that the money from the sale, together with the proceeds of the $2.5 billion in equity just raised, would all be applied to the company’s debt and would not be used for any other purpose.

Glencore’s debt reduction plan, released in September, aims to cut the company’s net debt load by a third, or $10 billion, by the end of 2016. But company officials told fund managers on Wednesday that Glencore was on track to meet those goals far earlier than anticipated, during the second or even first quarters of next year.

The Glencore officials went on to say that it was not facing a “Lehman-like” meltdown and that it had plenty of cash on hand to meet all of its trading and funding needs. They noted that the company’s cash revolvers and other medium to long-term credit facilities were not subject to any restrictive covenants linked to its credit rating. Company officials said it was in no danger of losing access to its credit lines or being forced to put up additional collateral if its debt is downgraded on Thursday, or sometime in the future.

Glencore’s stock fell as much as 30% on Monday after Investec Securities in London published a scenario analysis calling into question the ability of some of the large commodity players to meet their debt obligations amid weakening commodity prices.

Glencore didn’t do well in the scenario analysis, setting off a panic that took the market by surprise. Glencore officials dismissed the Investec report, insisting that it has access to more than enough cash to meet its needs. The company’s share price recovered somewhat on Wednesday amid reports of a major copper miner cutting production in a bid to boost prices. Glencore, through its Xtrata acquisition, is one of the largest copper miners in the world. But despite the uptick, Glencore’s stock remained depressed, ending the day down around 35% from where it was last week.

The company has told fund managers that its net debt levels, while high at around $32 billion, is manageable, equating to just around 2.8-times forward earnings. That is far lower than mining giant Mittal, which is five-times levered, or fellow commodity trader Nobel, which is seven-times levered. Lehman Brothers, by comparison, was 30 to 40-times levered when it melted down in September 2008.

The fund managers attending the meeting were, for the most part, satisfied with Glencore’s explanation, according to a person with knowledge of the matter. Glencore said it would have more of these meetings for interested parties, with at least one scheduled in New York taking place in the next two weeks, this person said.

The meeting took place at the Connaught Hotel in London’s Mayfair neighborhood, which is home to many investment management firms. Carlos Perezagua, Glencore’s co-head of corporate finance and capital markets, and Paul Smith, who heads Glencore’s communications and investor relations, ran the meeting. A Glencore spokesman, Charles Watenphul, confirmed to Fortune that the meeting did take place but said he couldn’t comment on anything that was said as he was not in attendance.

About the Author
By Cyrus Sanati
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Finance

Personal Financemortgages
Current mortgage rates report for Dec. 8, 2025: Rates hold steady with Fed meeting on horizon
By Glen Luke FlanaganDecember 8, 2025
44 minutes ago
Personal FinanceReal Estate
Current ARM mortgage rates report for Dec. 8, 2025
By Glen Luke FlanaganDecember 8, 2025
44 minutes ago
Personal FinanceReal Estate
Current refi mortgage rates report for Dec. 8, 2025
By Glen Luke FlanaganDecember 8, 2025
44 minutes ago
CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
5 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
9 hours ago
InvestingStock
What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks
By Julien Ponthus, Natalia Kniazhevich, Abhishek Vishnoi and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
9 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
17 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.