• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
FinanceEmployment

GOP candidates avoided the economy and jobs at last night’s debate

By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
September 17, 2015, 10:51 AM ET

I watched all three hours of last night’s Republican Party presidential debate, under the assumption that there would be lots of talk about jobs and the economy. Silly me.

Per the transcript, the term “interest rates” never came up, despite today’s pending Fed action. The word “jobs” was only spoken 26 times by the candidates, and one of those was when Carly Fiorina name-dropped Steve Jobs. Perhaps even more remarkable for a Republican debate, the phrase “small business” was uttered just once (by Scott Walker).

Even the word “economy” was only said 10 times by the candidates, four of which were when Marco Rubio and Chris Christie discussed “destroying” the economy by legislatively addressing climate change.

To be sure, a lot of the blame for this paucity of economic talk was on CNN’s moderation, but few of the candidates seemed eager to discuss such issues.

At least there was some discussion over how to tax hedge fund and private equity fund managers, in terms of the share of profits they receive from investing other people’s money (i.e., carried interest).

Donald Trump reaffirmed his support of reclassifying carried interest as ordinary income (it’s currently taxed at lower capital gains rates), which is something Jeb Bush also included in his recently-published tax plan. When asked if he also agreed with the change, John Kasich said: “I don’t at this point in terms of changing the incentives for investment and risk-taking.”

The carried interest tax question also was asked directly of both Rand Paul and Mike Huckabee, but they side-stepped it by instead endorsing a flat tax and fair tax, respectively.

CNN did not ask Bush about his far more wide-reaching plan to remove the deduction for borrowing costs (i.e., debt interest payments), which would affect everyone from leveraged buyout titans to small business owners taking out things like equipment loans. On that last point, I reached out yesterday to a Bush spokesperson to see if he planned any exceptions or minimum thresholds to his deduction elimination, but I never heard back.

About the Author
By Dan Primack
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Finance

CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
3 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
InvestingStock
What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks
By Julien Ponthus, Natalia Kniazhevich, Abhishek Vishnoi and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
Macron warns EU may hit China with tariffs over trade surplus
By James Regan and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
U.S. trade chief says China has complied with terms of trade deals
By Hadriana Lowenkron and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
PoliticsCongress
Leaders in Congress outperform rank-and-file lawmakers on stock trades by up to 47% a year, researchers say
By Jason MaDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
15 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.