• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

When should you start cashing in on Social Security?

By
Allan Sloan
Allan Sloan
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Allan Sloan
Allan Sloan
Down Arrow Button Icon
December 4, 2013, 10:00 AM ET

FORTUNE — Year-end festivities are approaching, with Hanukkah lights nearing their peak, Christmas lights going up, and the New Year’s celebration almost upon us. So what better time than the season of light is there to talk about … mortality?

No, I’m not raising this gloomy topic just to be contrarian at a time of widespread celebrations. I’m raising it in Fortune’s Investor’s Guide because one of the most interesting investment decisions that you may have to make (or may have already made) involves estimating how long you’re likely to live.

This decision doesn’t involve stocks or bonds. It involves Social Security retirement benefits.

Here’s the deal, in grossly simplified form, which is the only way to deal with Social Security questions without bogging down. If you’ve got the requisite 10 years of employment (or have been married long enough to someone with the requisite 10 years), you can begin drawing Social Security retirement benefits at any time from ages 62 to 70. The earlier you begin taking money, the less money you get a year. The later you begin, the more you get.

MORE: Electronic payments are paying off for Mexico

For example, at 62, you get 75% of your normal retirement benefit. At 66, you get 100%. At 70 it’s 132%. Each year you wait from 62 on increases your benefits by about 8%.

Social Security doesn’t care when you begin taking your money, because people getting lower payments for longer periods cost the system the same as people getting a higher payment for shorter periods. But when you take your money can make a huge difference to you and your survivors, as you’ll see.

There are drawbacks to taking benefits at 62 if you’re employed. I discuss them and the assumptions on which this column is based at the bottom of the page. At 66, however, there are no penalties. That’s when the decision becomes purely economic.

The conventional wisdom is to wait until you’re 70 to draw benefits if you can afford to, because each year you wait increases your payments by about 8% — think of waiting as longevity insurance. If you make it to your mid-eighties or longer, you would do better to wait. The rough math: If instead of getting 100% at 66 you start collecting 132% at 70, it takes 12½ years for that 32% difference to equal the four years of benefits you would have collected starting at 66.

MORE: Giant pool of money that ate the U.S. not as awful as initially thought

So if you live to your mid-eighties or longer, you win big. But of course there’s a risk: If you don’t collect anything and die at, say, 69 and 11 months, you (and your survivors) get nothing. It’s what’s known in the insurance biz as mortality risk.

Once you’re 66, it’s hard to give up 8% a year, especially these days. But there’s that pesky mortality risk: Both my parents died in their early seventies. So let me show you the middle path that my wife and I decided to follow. We began to collect Social Security two years ago, when I turned 67. (She’s somewhat younger than I am.) So have we walked away from the prospect of higher income? Not totally.

We’ve been taking our monthly Social Security benefits and investing them, primarily in individual dividend-paying stocks. If we can earn 4% or 5% a year from these investments, it makes up for a good part of the 8% Social Security increase that we’re forgoing. And who knows, maybe we’ll earn even more. Meanwhile, it hedges our mortality risk and leaves our family better off if one or both of us don’t make it to our eighties.

With luck, I’ll be able to write a follow-up column 15 years from now and let you know how our hybrid Social Security strategy has turned out. But in deference to the season, I’ll stop being depressing. Enjoy the year-end lights.

———————————–

How it works

If you opt to take retirement benefits at ages 62 through 65 and 11 months, part of your benefit is deferred if you earn more than a certain amount — currently $15,120 a year — from working. Social Security defers one dollar from your benefit for every two dollars you earn above the threshold. The deferred amount goes to increase the benefits that you get starting at age 66 (or, under some circumstances, later).

There’s a second earnings test, far more complicated than the first one, that applies to your earnings in the year that you turn 66. It involves how much you make in the months before your 66th birthday. I can’t begin to explain it.

However, as long as you wait until you turn 66 (or later) to start taking benefits, neither test will pose a problem.

A further note: I can’t help you straighten out any problems you might have with Social Security or help you understand what rules cover you. Please consult the Social Security Administration or an outside expert for help. This stuff can be very complicated, to say the least.

Here are the Social Security benefits that people born through Dec. 31, 1954 would get, as a percentage of their “primary insurance amount,” by beginning to take retirement payments at ages ranging from 62 (the earliest allowable date) to 70 (the latest date).

Age     Percentage

62        75%
63        80%
64        86.6667%
65        93.3333%
66        100%
67        108%
68        116%
69        124%
70        132%

In my column, I tried to keep things simple by saying that each year after 62 that you wait to collect benefits increases the benefit amounts by about 8%. Please note the “about.” As you can see from the numbers above, it’s not a straight line increase of 8% a year.

These numbers apply only to people born through the end of 1954. There are different numbers for people born in 1955 or later. The normal retirement age rises to 66 and 2 months for people born in 1955 and increases by two months annually until it reaches 67 for people born in 1960 and later.

Note: All the numbers here assume that Social Security’s benefit formula remains unchanged. However, I expect the formula to change at some point for future recipients, and possibly even for current recipients like my wife and me, who are drawing maximum benefits for our category because my employers and I paid maximum Social Security tax for more than 35 years.

Source: Fortune, based on information from the Social Security Administration

A shorter version of this story appeared in the December 23, 2013 issue of Fortune. 

About the Author
By Allan Sloan
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025

Most Popular

Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Finance
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam
By Fortune Editors
October 20, 2025
Fortune Secondary Logo
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Features
  • Leadership
  • Health
  • Commentary
  • Success
  • Retail
  • Mpw
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
  • CEO Initiative
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Conferences
  • Europe
  • Newsletters
  • Personal Finance
  • Environment
  • Magazine
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
  • Group Subscriptions
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • Facebook icon
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  • Instagram icon
  • Pinterest icon

Latest in

dario
AIWhite House
White House chief of staff to meet with Anthropic CEO about dangerous new Mythos model, official says
By Josh Boak, Matt O'Brien and The Associated PressApril 17, 2026
37 minutes ago
broker
EnergyMarkets
Oil is back to early war days, S&P 500 jumps to all-time high
By Stan Choe and The Associated PressApril 17, 2026
42 minutes ago
Photo of Donald Trump (left) and Pete Hegseth (right)
Economynational debt
Something is different about Trump’s $1 trillion war on Iran and its stress on the national debt, Harvard Kennedy scholar says
By Sasha RogelbergApril 17, 2026
1 hour ago
Huel Shake Review (2026): Expert Approved
HealthDietary Supplements
Huel Shake Review (2026): Expert Approved
By Emily PharesApril 17, 2026
2 hours ago
Half of Iran’s workforce faces unemployment risk as the U.S.-Israel war’s ‘hidden target’ was the labor market, economist says
EconomyIran
Half of Iran’s workforce faces unemployment risk as the U.S.-Israel war’s ‘hidden target’ was the labor market, economist says
By Jason MaApril 17, 2026
2 hours ago
Exclusive: Adam Silver on winning the Edison Achievement Award: ‘Sports remind us that some of the most important forms of innovation are human’
Arts & EntertainmentSports
Exclusive: Adam Silver on winning the Edison Achievement Award: ‘Sports remind us that some of the most important forms of innovation are human’
By Catherina GioinoApril 17, 2026
3 hours ago

Most Popular

Pope Leo warned the world is in ‘big trouble’ if Elon Musk becomes the first trillionaire
Success
Pope Leo warned the world is in ‘big trouble’ if Elon Musk becomes the first trillionaire
By Preston ForeApril 17, 2026
12 hours ago
A world going broke: IMF says America's $39 trillion national debt is actually a global problem—and AI may be the only rescue
Economy
A world going broke: IMF says America's $39 trillion national debt is actually a global problem—and AI may be the only rescue
By Nick LichtenbergApril 16, 2026
1 day ago
Jeff Bezos pledged $10 billion for climate change. With the 2030 clock ticking, his wife, Lauren Sánchez Bezos, is leading the charge to spend it
Environment
Jeff Bezos pledged $10 billion for climate change. With the 2030 clock ticking, his wife, Lauren Sánchez Bezos, is leading the charge to spend it
By Sydney LakeApril 15, 2026
2 days ago
MacKenzie Scott is bypassing the Ivy League and rewriting the $79 billion higher ed playbook by giving to HBCUs and community colleges
Politics
MacKenzie Scott is bypassing the Ivy League and rewriting the $79 billion higher ed playbook by giving to HBCUs and community colleges
By Sydney LakeApril 16, 2026
1 day ago
Germany already told its workers to ditch four-day weeks and work-life balance. Now the government wants to cut their pay for calling in sick, too
Success
Germany already told its workers to ditch four-day weeks and work-life balance. Now the government wants to cut their pay for calling in sick, too
By Orianna Rosa RoyleApril 16, 2026
2 days ago
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani points at Ken Griffin's $238 million penthouse on tax day: 'Today we're taxing the rich'
Personal Finance
NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani points at Ken Griffin's $238 million penthouse on tax day: 'Today we're taxing the rich'
By Catherina GioinoApril 16, 2026
1 day ago

© 2026 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.