• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

The New York Times takes two cracks at Apple in one day

By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
May 2, 2013, 5:53 PM ET

FORTUNE — Honorable men and women can disagree about whether a front page story in Thursday’s New York Times, blamed Apple (AAPL) for the epidemic of cellphone thefts or merely accused the company of not doing all it could.

But there’s no getting around the fatal problem with the sentence in Floyd Norris’ Apple’s Shuffle Keeps Profit Out of Reach of Taxes, posted Thursday afternoon in the Times‘ Business Day section, that begins:

“Starbucks could get away with paying no taxes in Britain, and Apple can get away with paying little in the United States [relative to the profits it makes] …” [See UPDATE 1]

Little?

Let me quote from the New York Times itself, in a Jan. 3, 2013 piece by Charles Duhigg and David Kocieniewski titled Inquiry Into Tech Giants’ Tax Strategies Nears End:

“In its statement, Apple said it paid ‘an enormous amount of taxes’ to local, state and federal governments. ‘In fiscal 2012 we paid $6 billion in federal corporate income taxes, which is 1 out of every 40 dollars in corporate income taxes collected by the U.S. government.'” [See UPDATE 2]

If that doesn’t make Apple the country’s single largest corporate tax payer, it surely puts it near the top.

We all know Apple is an easy target. The New York Times has a Pulitzer to prove it. But if the Times is going to pick on the company, maybe it should check its facts against its own reporting.

UPDATE 1: The phrase in brackets — “relative to the profits it makes” — was added to Norris’ column after this item appeared. While it may add to the sentence’s truthiness quotient, I’m not certain it pushes it over the line.

UPDATE 2: Before it went to press for Friday’s paper edition, Norris added this paragraph: “A company spokesman says the company paid $6 billion in federal income taxes last year, and ‘several billion dollars in income taxes within the U.S. in 2011.’” That helps, although for the record, the $6 billion was paid in Apple’s fiscal 2012, which isn’t quite the same as “last year.”

About the Author
By Philip Elmer-DeWitt
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

InnovationBrainstorm Design
Procurement execs often don’t understand the value of good design, experts say
By Angelica AngDecember 8, 2025
36 minutes ago
Personal Financemortgages
Current mortgage rates report for Dec. 8, 2025: Rates hold steady with Fed meeting on horizon
By Glen Luke FlanaganDecember 8, 2025
1 hour ago
Personal FinanceReal Estate
Current ARM mortgage rates report for Dec. 8, 2025
By Glen Luke FlanaganDecember 8, 2025
1 hour ago
Personal FinanceReal Estate
Current refi mortgage rates report for Dec. 8, 2025
By Glen Luke FlanaganDecember 8, 2025
1 hour ago
CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
5 hours ago
Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
9 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
17 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.