• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Why ICE is the only deal that makes sense for NYSE

By
Cyrus Sanati
Cyrus Sanati
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Cyrus Sanati
Cyrus Sanati
Down Arrow Button Icon
December 20, 2012, 8:11 PM ET

FORTUNE — The proposed acquisition of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) by the Atlanta-based InterContinental Exchange (ICE) at first blush appears to create a national exchange with broad reach, ensuring Wall Street’s dominance in the financial world. But while the financial exchange supermarket that the two would create would make life easier for traders, it doesn’t make much sense for investors, especially for ICE investors who will plunk down a sizable premium for the $8.2 billion acquisition.

No, today’s deal is more about running the Big Board through the chopping block. It’s sad to say, but the NYSE is worth much more sliced up than it’s worth as a whole. ICE is most likely going to keep the NYSE’s European derivatives business, NYSE Liffe, and jettison the rest in a combination of sales and spin offs, including the iconic “floor” of the exchange, to the highest bidder.

The NYSE (NYX) has had a “For Sale” sign on its door for a very long time. Duncan Niederauer, the chief executive of the NYSE, had been trying to cook up some sort of deal to sell the company and cash in almost since his first day on the job. If it wasn’t for the market tumult of 2008, he would have probably sealed the deal by now. But it wasn’t just the markets that were against him. So was Washington, and to a certain extent, Wall Street.

MORE: Private equity for the average Joe? It’s coming

His plan to sell the iconic NYSE outright to Germany’s Deutsche Borse last year would have created a $10 billion transatlantic trading titan. But European regulators balked at such an ambitious deal. Not for the equity trading part of the deal, but because it would give the combined company a virtual monopoly in the European derivatives space. While that might seem like an esoteric part of the deal, it was actually the entire point of it. At the time, fees from derivatives trading comprised a third of the NYSE’s total net revenue and 40% of its profits. Much of that came from its NYSE’s Liffe derivatives platform based in Europe. Unlike with equities, where margins have eroded over the years due to new entrants and dark pools, derivatives still had a bit of protection from new upstarts. Indeed, Liffe’s only real competition in Europe was Eurex, which was half-owned by Deutsche Borse.

Meshing Liffe and Eurex together would have been a gold mine as it would have given the combined company almost total dominance in trading and clearing European derivatives. Keenly sensing that such a deal would never pass regulatory muster in Europe, the Nasdaq (NDAQ) and ICE (ICE) proposed a joint takeover deal for the NYSE. The Nasdaq would get the NYSE’s equity trading and listing business and ICE would get the NYSE’s derivatives business. Niederauer wouldn’t even talk with the American interlopers, though, hoping to seal the carefully crafted deal he had put together with Deutsche Borse.

No one would win this round. European regulators, of course, crushed the Deutsche Borse deal due to the derivatives monopoly. On this side of the Atlantic, US regulators weren’t too enthused about the idea of combining the Nasdaq with the NYSE as the combined company would dominate the US equity listing market.

MORE: The tax bite of top mutual funds

The one part of the deal that did work was combining the NYSE and ICE. The business lines of the two companies didn’t overlap as ICE had neither an equity trading platform in the US nor a big presence in the European derivatives market. The reason ICE teamed up with Nasdaq was because it needed to make a big bid to counter Deutsche Borse’s $10 billion bid. The deal allowed ICE to keep the European derivatives business and immediately hive off the NYSE’s equity trading and listing business.

Thursday’s announcement solves all the regulatory problems and gives ICE what it truly wants – access to the European derivatives market. The company didn’t waste any time, issuing a separate statement in addition to the merger announcement noting that ICE’s clearinghouse in London would begin clearing trades for NYSE Liffe. Jeff Sprecher, ICE’s chief executive, said on the conference call Thursday that it was “just a happy circumstance” that Liffe is trying to develop its own clearing opportunities. Such a move would remove any “uncertainty around the completion of a potential clearinghouse” and allow the two companies to “very quickly turn [their] attention together” on the interest rate derivatives space.

“Happy circumstance,” it wasn’t – it was pretty much why the deal happened. The combination makes ICE a powerhouse in the European derivatives space as it will be able to both clear and facilitate trades, most notably interest rate swaps and credit default swaps, which will begin moving onto the exchange soon. ICE has no use for an equities platform in either the US or Europe. It paid a high price – 35% premium to where the NYSE last traded Wednesday – because it thinks it can become a major player in the growing derivatives space, not because it wants to babysit a bunch of servers in New Jersey and manage a glorified TV studio on Wall Street.

When asked what he will do with the other parts of the NYSE, Sprecher was vague. He did note that the company was mulling a spinoff of the NYSE’s European equities business. That should be expected as soon as the ink is dry on the merger agreement, which should take most of next year to clear the regulatory gauntlet.  Similar spin-offs of the rest of the NYSE will likely follow. There are a number of large and small exchanges that could want NYSE’s equity trading unit, from big players like the London Stock Exchange to smaller ones like BATS and DirectEdge.

So while it looks like the fight for control of the floor of the NYSE is over, it is most likely still on.

About the Author
By Cyrus Sanati
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

Timm Chiusano
Successcreator economy
After he ‘fired himself’ from a Fortune 100 job that paid up to $800k, the ‘Mister Rogers’ of Corporate America shows Gen Z how to handle toxic bosses
By Jessica CoacciDecember 6, 2025
18 minutes ago
Mark Zuckerberg laughs during his 2017 Harvard commencement speech
SuccessMark Zuckerberg
Mark Zuckerberg says the ‘most important thing’ he built at Harvard was a prank website: ‘Without Facemash I wouldn’t have met Priscilla’
By Dave SmithDecember 6, 2025
1 hour ago
AIMeta
It’s ‘kind of jarring’: AI labs like Meta, Deepseek, and Xai earned some of the worst grades possible on an existential safety index
By Patrick Kulp and Tech BrewDecember 5, 2025
13 hours ago
RetailConsumer Spending
U.S. consumers are so financially strained they put more than $1 billion on buy-now, pay later services during Black Friday and Cyber Monday
By Jeena Sharma and Retail BrewDecember 5, 2025
13 hours ago
Elon Musk
Big TechSpaceX
Musk’s SpaceX discusses record valuation, IPO as soon as 2026
By Edward Ludlow, Loren Grush, Lizette Chapman, Eric Johnson and BloombergDecember 5, 2025
13 hours ago
data center
EnvironmentData centers
The rise of AI reasoning models comes with a big energy tradeoff
By Rachel Metz, Dina Bass and BloombergDecember 5, 2025
13 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Two months into the new fiscal year and the U.S. government is already spending more than $10 billion a week servicing national debt
By Eleanor PringleDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
‘Godfather of AI’ says Bill Gates and Elon Musk are right about the future of work—but he predicts mass unemployment is on its way
By Preston ForeDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nearly 4 million new manufacturing jobs are coming to America as boomers retire—but it's the one trade job Gen Z doesn't want
By Emma BurleighDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang admits he works 7 days a week, including holidays, in a constant 'state of anxiety' out of fear of going bankrupt
By Jessica CoacciDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Real Estate
‘There is no Mamdani effect’: Manhattan luxury home sales surge after mayoral election, undercutting predictions of doom and escape to Florida
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
17 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.