• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

The Bain Capital divide

By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
September 6, 2012, 7:35 PM ET

FORTUNE — Last week was Tampa. This week is Charlotte. My reason for being in both was to gauge delegate understanding of Bain Capital, and how that understanding impacted their opinions of a President Romney.

To be honest, I expected lots of crazy talk from both sides. Talk about how Bain was the greatest force for job creation since Henry Ford developed the assembly line, or how Romney used to buy companies just so that he could gleefully fire all of its employees. Words like savior and vampire. And yes, there was a bit of that.

But, for the most part, delegates of both parties displayed a fairly strong understanding of what Bain Capital is really all about: Making money for investors and itself by buying and selling companies. They both got that private equity is largely agnostic toward the issue of job creation, and that failure is sometimes part of doing business.

What was different, however, was how that mutual understanding translates to the voting booth.

For Republican delegates, Romney’s private equity experience has been his best selling point. His investments in a variety of different industry sectors means that he has a deep understanding of everything from retail to manufacturing to medical devices. And even his failed deals come with a silver lining, because he now knows what mistakes not to repeat. Moreover, he made his investors richer. Why wouldn’t he do the same for the American people?

For Democrats, however, Romney’s business success is viewed as largely irrelevant to the job of governing. Being president, they say, is about people rather than profit — and you can’t just shut America down and move onto the new thing if times get tough. The goal is to broadly help the most people possible, not to perform lucrative feats for a relatively select few.

The battle battle over Bain Capital isn’t really about the propriety of private equity, just like the 99% vs. 1% debate isn’t really about bashing the rich. It’s about competing visions of American government, policy and what types of life experiences we value most in our elected officials. It’s a worthy conversation that delegates on the convention floors are having, even if most of the convention speakers aren’t.

Sign up for Dan’s daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com

About the Author
By Dan Primack
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.