• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Trendingnow

1

Ed Sheeran asked Patriots owner Robert Kraft for $2 million aid donation after Macklemore was dropped from his tour for pro-Palestine comments

2

Meet Warren Buffett's son Howard, a former sheriff, war photographer, and now, Berkshire's new chairman

3

Anthropic billionaire cofounder Jack Clark studied literature, not code—and says liberal arts degrees will win in the AI age

1

Ed Sheeran asked Patriots owner Robert Kraft for $2 million aid donation after Macklemore was dropped from his tour for pro-Palestine comments

2

Meet Warren Buffett's son Howard, a former sheriff, war photographer, and now, Berkshire's new chairman

3

Anthropic billionaire cofounder Jack Clark studied literature, not code—and says liberal arts degrees will win in the AI age

Goldman dodges crisis-related charges twice in one day

By
Stephen Gandel
Stephen Gandel
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Stephen Gandel
Stephen Gandel
Down Arrow Button Icon
August 10, 2012, 2:08 PM ET
Google source logo
Add Fortune on Google for similar content.

FORTUNE –All of a sudden, Goldman Sachs (GS) looks increasingly likely to get a pass for much of its alleged misdeed in the run up to the financial crisis. On Thursday, the bank was cleared of its remaining financial crisis-related charges by both the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Department of Justice. Other firms might not be so lucky.

What’s more, in the biggest scandals now facing banks – charges that they fixed a key lending rate Libor and laundered money for Iran and others – Goldman isn’t implicated. In fact, in the case of Libor, some have said that Goldman was a victim and could sue for damages.

MORE: Goldman Sachs trading profit plunges

But the bank isn’t done paying for the financial crisis yet. Goldman increased what it thinks it could have to pay to resolve its pending litigation in the second quarter by $700 million to $3.4 billion, in part because the firm settled a class action suit brought by investors that alleged Goldman filled a registration statement that violated securities laws when it underwrote a 2006 $698 million mortgage bond. Terms of the settlement were not disclosed.

Still, it’s a big turnaround for the firm once thought of the financial crisis’ No. 1 villain, and it’s sure to ignite new criticism that the government bungled investigations into crimes surrounding the financial crisis.

On Thursday, the Department of Justice said that there was no viable basis to bring criminal charges against Goldman for its role in selling mortgage bonds during the mid-2000s credit bubble. The investigation stemmed from a 635-page congressional report that uncovered numerous e-mails in which Goldman bankers and traders privately disparaged investments they were aggressively pitching to clients. The report also said that Goldman and others secretly bet against mortgage bonds they were marketing to clients as good investments.

MORE: Citi’s odd foreclosure rental program

The firm had also been facing the possibility that it could be charged with securities fraud in connection with its role in selling a $1.3 billion bond made up of subprime mortgages called the Fremont Home Loan Trust 2006-E. Many of the mortgages appeared to have lower downpayments or be made to borrowers with lower credit scores than Goldman let on. But on Thursday, Goldman said that the SEC had told the firm earlier in the week that it had closed its investigation into the mortgage bond sale and decided not to bring an enforcement action.

Still, while Goldman looks increasingly in the clear, other firms continue to face financial crisis related charges. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) said the SEC is still deciding whether to bring charges against the firm related to mortgage bonds that it and Bear Stearns, which was bought by JPMorgan in mid-2008, sold. Wells Fargo’s (WFC) mortgage operations also remain under investigation by the SEC. The fact that Goldman was let off the off the hook and that these banks remain under investigation may mean that charges against JPMorgan and Wells are more likely.

But if charges are coming, the government better hurry up. The statute of limitations for cases for financial crisis misdeeds, which in most instances is 5-years, is quickly running out.

About the Author
By Stephen Gandel
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in


Most Popular

Fortune Secondary Logo
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • World's Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
  • Lists Calendar
Sections
  • Finance
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Features
  • Leadership
  • Health
  • Commentary
  • Success
  • Retail
  • Mpw
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
  • CEO Initiative
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Conferences
  • Europe
  • Newsletters
  • Personal Finance
  • Environment
  • Magazine
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
  • Group Subscriptions
About Us
  • About Us
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • About Us
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • Facebook icon
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  • Instagram icon
  • TikTok icon
  • YouTube icon

    Latest in


    Most Popular

    © 2026 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
    FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.