• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

SOPA’s chief sponsor harder to defeat than SOPA was

By
Dan Mitchell
Dan Mitchell
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Mitchell
Dan Mitchell
Down Arrow Button Icon
June 2, 2012, 8:29 AM ET

FORTUNE — Crowdsourcing the opposition to SOPA and PIPA, the congressional bills aimed at foreign digital pirates, seemed to work. Opponents were loud, and the blackouts of popular Web sites such as Wikipedia and Reddit turned out to be the tipping point. The bills were defeated.

Crowdsourcing utterly failed, however, when it came to the attempt to unseat a leading proponent of SOPA, Texas Republican Lamar Smith, who easily defeated his primary opponents and who will likely keep his congressional seat, despite the best efforts of the denizens of Reddit.

Smith crushed his two opponents, Richard Mack and Richard Morgan, drawing 76 percent of the vote in Tuesday’s primary.

This was hardly a shock – Smith is an entrenched incumbent who has spent a quarter-century in the House. Such candidates tend to draw most of the contributions: Smith took in about $1.3 million, or about 25 times the amount Mack collected. Morgan took in just $9,500.

About half of the money Smith raised was institutional, and a big part of that came from media organizations and lobbyists that supported SOPA and PIPA. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Comcast (CMCSA) donated $5,000 in PAC money while Time Warner (TWX) (publisher of Fortune) gave $6,000 through its PAC. Executives from Clear Channel Communications gave $18,300. The National Association of Broadcasters and the Recording Industry Association of America gave a total of $8,000 through their PACs while RIAA executives forked over an additional $2,000.

Reddit created its own committee, called Test PAC, which spent about $18,500 trying to defeat Smith, according to the CRP. The money went to direct mail campaigns, TV spots, and billboards.

Of course, Smith won mostly because he’s a party-backed incumbent, and he got lots of money from lots of different sources. He took in not much more than the $1 million average for an incumbent congressman (the average challenger in the current primary season raised about $140,000, says the CRP). Still, he’s a reliable supporter of big-media interests, a fact that is reflected in the proportion of media money his campaign has attracted.

About the Author
By Dan Mitchell
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
4 hours ago
Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago
InvestingStock
What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks
By Julien Ponthus, Natalia Kniazhevich, Abhishek Vishnoi and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
Macron warns EU may hit China with tariffs over trade surplus
By James Regan and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
U.S. trade chief says China has complied with terms of trade deals
By Hadriana Lowenkron and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
16 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.