• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Why AAPL dropped 10.32 points Friday

By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
January 23, 2010, 11:31 AM ET

Apple got whacked for no good reason in advance of Monday’s earnings report



Click to enlarge. Source: AAPL Sanity's sepod

I don’t pretend to understand much about how derivatives work or what hedge fund managers do, but I’ve been watching the ups and downs of Apple’s (AAPL) stock price long enough to recognize a pattern when I see it.

This one was a classic slingshot, described succinctly by Jason Schwarz in his seminal Apple: Seven Reasons Shorts Love It:

“If you can keep a good stock down,” he wrote, “then you are able to load up for the ride back up. It’s like a slingshot — the harder you pull, the more propulsion you generate.”

This slingshot was timed to bring Apple’s shares down in advance of the company’s first quarter earnings report on Monday. The action started at 9:12 a.m. Friday when theflyonthewall.com reported, without explanation, that Deutsche Bank had removed Apple from its short-term buy list — a report that was immediately picked up by financial journalists, including the talking heads at CNBC, who mischaracterized it as a “downgrade.”

What actually happened, as the folks at Deutsche surely knew but didn’t bother to announce, was that Apple’s six months on their short-term list had expired that morning, triggering a computer instruction that removed it from the buy list automatically.

No matter. The boys were looking for a reason to take a whack at Apple, and this news fit the bill. They started dumping shares, and by the close of trading the stock had fallen 10.32 points (4.96%), shaving $9.3 billion off the company’s market cap.

The stock price having hit bottom, somebody started loading up on AAPL. More than 1.65 million shares traded hands at 3:59 p.m.

Adding insult to injury, a settlement trade at 8:01 p.m. appeared to bring the stock back up to $204.78 — a 3.55% pop in the dark of night. (See chart above, courtesy of AAPL Sanity’s sepod.) [UPDATE: I am told this last one was a “late cross” of 500 shares from earlier in the day — a fairly common occurrence on busy trading days — and will be gone by Monday morning.]

The point is, nobody really thinks that Apple is going to deliver a bad report on Monday. Quite the contrary. The consensus among the analysts we polled is that Cupertino had an amazing Christmas quarter, with earning up 30% or more year over year. (See Apple’s earning: What the analysts say.)

And I’m inclined to agree with iPhonAsia’s Dan Butterfield, who suggested in a bitter post written Friday evening  “that the majority of trading desks understood precisely what happened at Deutsche Bank, but held tight to the truth and may have intentionally misled the financial press (by omission).” (See Don’t get punked II.)

To his credit, CNBC’s Jim Goldman issued a correction an hour and a half before the market closed, explaining that his and everybody else’s “downgrade” report was a mistake. But by then there was too much momentum against Apple — and indeed the entire market — for the tide to turn.

It’s days like this that make President Obama’s so-called Volker Rule — his proposal to ban bank holding companies from owning, investing in or sponsoring hedge funds or private equity funds — sound not so crazy after all.

I have no idea what the market’s going to do Monday morning, but people much smarter than I have some pretty good ideas about what Apple is going to report that afternoon. See here.

Tune in at 4:30 p.m. ET Monday for our coverage of Apple’s Q1 2010 earnings report and its 5:00 p.m. conference call. And come back Wednesday at 1:00 p.m. ET for our live blog of Apple’s “latest creation” event in San Francisco.

See also:

  • Apple’s earning: What the analysts say
  • Apple’s Q4 2009 earnings: How the analysts got it so wrong
  • The day Apple released its iPhone revenue bomb

[Follow Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Twitter @philiped]

About the Author
By Philip Elmer-DeWitt
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
4 hours ago
Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
InvestingStock
What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks
By Julien Ponthus, Natalia Kniazhevich, Abhishek Vishnoi and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
Macron warns EU may hit China with tariffs over trade surplus
By James Regan and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
U.S. trade chief says China has complied with terms of trade deals
By Hadriana Lowenkron and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
16 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.