Are we in the midst of a bumper year for climate change cases?

Last month, in a stunning day for the oil and gas industry, a Dutch court ordered Shell to reduce its emissions faster than it had planned. The ruling wasn’t the first time a court in the Netherlands has ruled in favor of reducing emissions (in the past, Dutch courts have ruled against the government), but it was widely seen as a sign that climate change cases are coming to courtrooms in a big way.

But that wasn’t the only legal challenge this year. In Poland, the government is currently facing a challenge over its emissions targets, while in Australia, a federal court recently ruled in favor of a legal challenge to the government’s approval of a coal plant. In South Africa, a case was brought to court challenging the government on air quality grounds over several plants, while in Belgium, a Brussels court just ruled that the government had breached human rights laws by failing to meet its carbon targets. There are cases related to climate change currently pending everywhere from Canada to Haiti, Mexico, Brazil, and the U.K.

In China, too, legal cases are growing: Bloomberg reports that judges heard 3,500 petitions last year relating to the environment—in 2015, they heard just 45. (There is a catch, of course—the Chinese government closely controls who can bring such cases, and which ones ultimately come to light.)

That reflects a pattern of global momentum behind climate litigation. In February, the UN and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University released a joint report showing that 2020 was a record year for climate litigation.

By that year—a year, mind, in which most of this filing and appealing would have had to have been done virtually—1,550 cases connected to climate change had been brought in 38 different countries; 1,200 in the U.S. alone.

While the report said the majority of the cases were still in wealthy countries—after the U.S., Australia and the EU were the most common places for cases to be filed—the authors expected litigation to rise in the global South, and noted that plaintiffs were becoming more diverse.

They also pointed to three trends in the kinds of cases they were seeing: cases focused on “violations of climate rights” in the context of fundamental human rights to food and shelter, for example; failures of governments to enforce their own climate and emissions goals, and finally, “greenwashing and non-disclosures” by companies. (A subject, no doubt, for a future newsletter.)

But while the most high-profile cases are pushing governments and companies to cut their emissions harder and faster, it’s worth remembering that climate litigation cuts both ways—especially in the U.S.

When I spoke to Michael Gerrard, the founder of the Sabin Center, a few months ago for another story, he said there has been an increase in suits brought “by both sides.”

“Everything Obama tried to do on climate change was challenged in court by Texas, West Virginia and many big industries,” under the Trump Administration, he noted. “And with Biden, the same thing is inevitably going to happen.”

If you want to track cases for yourself, check out the Climate Change Litigation Database—it covers both U.S. and international cases—and is jointly run by the Sabin Center and Arnold & Porter. They also provide monthly updates on their blog on what new cases are appearing.

Meanwhile, this week brought a special Path to Zero package at Fortune, covering sustainability and supply chains. The stories cover everything from GM’s emissions goals to Big Tech grappling with e-waste. You can read the entire report here.

More below.

Katherine Dunn
katherine.dunn@fortune.com
@katherine_dunn

Correction: This article incorrectly stated that the total number of cases (1,550 globally and 1,200 in the U.S.) were for 2020 alone. Those numbers were cumulative to July 2020, not for 2020 alone.

CARBON COPY

Deep Sea Mining 

In this fascinating look at the deep sea—and its tempting potential as a source of rare metals needed in everything from EVs to cell phones—Elizabeth Kolbert asks whether we're at risk of destroying a world we still know almost nothing about. New Yorker

Under water

The Bahaman poet and essayist Bernard Ferguson weighs the lingering damage of Dorian, a hurricane that hit the island nearly two years ago, in this powerful piece for the New York Times Magazine's climate issue. He tracks how strengthening storms worsened by climate change have battered and flooded vulnerable island nations—who themselves barely contribute to global emissions. New York Times Magazine

Solar boom 

The U.S.' solar industry is hoping for a turnaround. Given President Biden's push for an all-electric grid, and made-in-America manufacturing policies for clean energy, bolstering the domestic solar industry seems like an obvious choice. But U.S. companies like First Energy are up against the formidable Chinese solar boom. WSJ

Clean up

This story from Grist tackles the blight of orphaned wells and other abandoned sites—and whether bankruptcy laws help enable them. More than 260 oil and gas companies have declared bankruptcy in the last six years, many of them pushed over the edge by low prices over 2020 (though oil is back up at a two-year high.) In some cases, this can mean companies get out of their legal obligations to clean up behind them. Grist

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

Some analysts see a return to $100 oil—but faltering re-openings could bring price down to earth by Katherine Dunn

Engine No. 1 to launch $100 million ETF focused on ESG engagement by Katherine Dunn

Your supply chain is the secret to sustainability success by Rich Lesser

China is rationing hydropower—and Bitcoin mines are getting cut off by Eamon Barrett 

How Kleenex owner Kimberley-Clark is changing how its paper products are made to curb deforestation by Danielle Bernabe

The batteries that will power our green recovery by Michael Insulan and Benedikt Sobotka

In long-distance race with Tesla, Porsche looks to new battery tech for an edge by Christiaan Hetzner

CLOSING NUMBER

1.5 million

That's how many barrels of oil North Dakota alone produced last year—more than the entire U.K. That figure, a product of the shale boom, led to a "rebirth" of the state's economy, even as the prospect of the energy transition looms. This FT story tracks the "energy divide" from Bismarck, North Dakota, heading south to Houston, Texas, and the divides between locals who are pushing the transitions forwards, and those who are getting left behind.