CEO DailyCFO DailyBroadsheetData SheetTerm Sheet

The era of Central Bank Coins is upon us. Here’s why.

November 11, 2020, 3:38 PM UTC

This is the web version of The Ledger, Fortune’s weekly newsletter covering financial technology and cryptocurrency. Sign up here to get it free in your inbox.

Central banks have shown remarkable openness to creating state-backed digital currencies over the past year or so. Dozens of them have begun to explore the technology, which shares some DNA with blockchain currencies like Bitcoin, and broadly promises to accelerate and simplify the settlement of transactions. The Bank for International Settlements has laid out tentative standards, and even U.S. Fed chair Jay Powell has talked about the roadmap for a U.S. CBDC.

“The main driver of the current interest in CBDCs is the need for national sovereignty around those technologies,” says Ken Timsit. He cites the twin threats of Facebook’s now-struggling Libra project and China’s major moves towards a CBDC as the primary motivators. “Central banks are realizing that if they don’t stay on top of these technologies, they could let other organizations, commercial or sovereign, have complete dominance.”

Timsit leads CBDC development at Consensys, the blockchain software startup founded by Ethereum cofounder Joe Lubin. Consensys has been on a CBDC hot streak: Last month the company announced it was working with Forge, the digital assets platform of giant French bank Societe Generale, to explore CBDC technology for France’s central bank. Consensys is also working on CBDC pilots or exploratory projects with the central bank of Thailand, Hong Kong’s monetary authority, and the central banks of Australia, Singapore, and South Africa.


From CBDCs to Zoomer banking apps, digital transformation is coming for finance – and Fortune is here to help you keep up. Tune in at noon on Wednesday, November 18 to hear leaders from Goldman Sachs, SoFi, and Mastercard discuss “Rebuilding Business with Digital Finance.” Registration is free.


Timsit says that the SocGen project, one of several competing to pitch ideas to the Banc de France, is focused on domestic rather than international applications.

One particular target is a shortcoming of the current banking and securities system known as “delivery vs. payment,” or DVP. Using current banking technology and practices, Timsit says, buying and selling securities is a surprisingly lengthy process, mired in a tangle of escrow and confirmations as trading desks and corporate treasuries reconcile deposits and trades. The industry standard window for this settlement process is two days. That’s an eternity in modern markets, and the capital involved in transactions is often locked for the duration, adding costs and reducing agility.

“Most of the delays that happen today are due to the fact that there is no single source of truth,” says Timsit. Blockchain-like CBDCs would create a ‘shared ledger’ of trustworthy and near-instant transaction and balance data, theoretically eliminating the agonizing process of back-office paper-shuffling. “Having access to a CBDC allows you to unlock liquidity in a day, instead of several days.”

The impact could be particularly significant, Timsit says, for smaller organizations looking to raise money. Bond issuance, for instance, is both complex and slow enough that it doesn’t make sense below a certain amount. CBDCs could also transform the so-called ‘repo market,’ where securities are lent for very short-term cash – a process where speed and accuracy are crucial.

Consensys’ strategy for its CBDC projects, Timsit says, is simple. “We are leveraging pieces of technology that are available off the shelf from Consensys,” he says, in hopes that those products will become part of the long-term structure of the systems. His work is also a necessity because, despite the buzz and openness, actual expertise in building CBDCs remains scarce within central banks.

“Unless we get involved in how to deploy the technology,” Timsit says, “not many people will know what to do with it.”

David Z. Morris




Analysts foresee Bitcoin hitting $20,000 ... What a Biden admin will mean for fintech ... Farewell Steve Mnuchin, an unlikely savior ... WhatsApp adds payments in India ... Investor Stan Druckenmiller believes in Bitcoin ... Ant vs. Tencent by the numbers ... The Zcash 'halving' could reverse the privacy coin's fortunes ... $964 million worth of Bitcoin moved from wallet dormant since 2015.


DOJ sues to block Visa's acquisition of Plaid ... All the finance regulations Trump rolled back ... Ex-Microsoft engineer sentenced in Bitcoin-linked scheme ... Fintechs turn to Instagram influencers for a leg up ... Crypto lender Cred files for bankruptcy.


In an email that Klarna sent to Gustafsson at the end of January ... the fintech said it had decided to discontinue Escobar Inc. as a business customer due to “ethical reasons”.

From the endlessly delightful saga of Escobar, Inc.'s lawsuit against European digital storefront platform Klarna, which Escobar, Inc. claims is wrongly holding €400,000 in sales revenue. Escobar, Inc. was for years headed by the brother of Pablo Escobar, and primarily pursued claims against Netflix and other entities that used the dead drug lord's name or likeness. But, as reported by Sifted, things changed when Swedish twentysomething Olof Gustafsson (a.k.a. "El Silencio") took the reins and began selling Escobar-branded cell phones.

Escobar Inc. admits these are Samsung or Apple phones with added gold plating. The truly sketchy part, though, is that the Escobar phones were being sold for less than the cost of the underlying products: the Escobar Gold 11 Pro was sold for $499, half the cost of the iPhone 11 under the gold. Escobar, Inc. claims the pricing was possible because it cut deals and used refurbished iPhones. But it lends credence to Klarna's rationale for keeping the money: there's substantial evidence the phones were never delivered, and Klarna says it's holding the funds to protect shoppers.


This week we're joined by Kristin Smith, head of lobbying group the Blockchain Association, to discuss the impact of a Biden presidency on cryptocurrency and distributed ledger technology.



The gobsmacking selloff of PayPal stock between Monday's open and Tuesday morning. News of a promising coronavirus vaccine from Pfizer triggered a bloodbath in so-called "stay at home" stocks, also including Netflix and Zoom. Investors apparently see a slowdown in this year's lightspeed digital transformation, including in payments. $PYPL (NASDAQ) has since recovered slightly - and it's still up an insane 114% since COVID hit the U.S. in mid-March.


Feds seize $1 billion in Bitcoin from mystery man 'X'Jeff John Roberts

Why Visa's $5 billion Plaid deal is in deep trouble - Aaron Pressman (Data Sheet)

Wyoming elects first Bitcoin owner to U.S. Senate - Jeff John Roberts

In the age of personal finance apps, this startup wants to bring back the spreadsheet - Brett Haensel

Jack Ma is the poster child of Chinese tech. Why is Beijing reining him in? - Naomi Xu Elegant and Clay Chandler

What a Biden administration means for the next stimulus package - Anne Sraders and Lance Lambert


Peter McCormack is host of the invaluable What Bitcoin Did podcast.

This edition of The Ledger was curated by David Z. Morris. Contact him at