• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
High-Speed Rail

White House Wants California to Return $2.5 Billion High-Speed Rail Funding

By
Lucas Laursen
Lucas Laursen
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Lucas Laursen
Lucas Laursen
Down Arrow Button Icon
February 20, 2019, 5:56 AM ET

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is canceling a $929 million grant to the California High-Speed Rail project and “actively exploring every legal option” for the return of $2.5 billion it has already contributed, it said Tuesday.

California governor Gavin Newsom tied the move to the state’s legal battle with the federal government over President Trump’s declaration of a national emergency on the Mexican border.

“It’s no coincidence that the Administration’s threat comes 24 hours after California led 16 states in challenging the President’s farcical ‘national emergency’,” Newsom said in a statement.

Last week Newsom revealed that California would reduce the scope of the rail project, first envisioned as a link between coastal Los Angeles and San Francisco, to a shorter stretch between Bakersfield and Merced in the agricultural Central Valley. He called the larger version of the project too expensive, slow, and opaque. One recent official estimate put costs at $77 billion, with other estimates predicting growth to $100 billion.

That led Trump to demand the return of all federal money appropriated for the project. “We want that money back now,” he tweeted. “Whole project is a ‘green’ disaster!”

The DOT compounded this sentiment in a letter Tuesday, stating that California “materially failed to comply with the terms of the agreement and has failed to make reasonable progress on the project.”

In response, a California state Senate staffer involved in the project told the Los Angeles Times that delays and changes to infrastructure projects are common. “Just look at any highway project,” said the staffer. “They are never done on schedule or on budget. They are often not done within the original scope.”

Federal clawbacks of so-called obligated, or committed, funds are also pretty much unprecedented, he added.

About the Author
By Lucas Laursen
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.