Artificial IntelligenceCryptocurrencyMetaverseCybersecurityTech Forward

U.S. Airlines Lose Bid to Dismiss Price-Fixing Lawsuit

October 30, 2016, 6:37 PM UTC
Southwest Airlines Begins Experiment With Assigned Seating
SAN DIEGO, CA - JULY 10: Ticket agent Nelly Riedel (C) informs passengers of a new seating system during check-in for a Southwest Airlines flight at the gate counter on July 10, 2006 at San Diego's Lindburgh Field Airport in San Diego, California. Contrary to the airlines's traditional practice, Southwest is experimenting with a new passenger seating system which made a trial run from San Diego to Phoenix. (Photo by Sandy Huffaker/Getty Images)
Sandy Huffaker Getty Images

A federal judge rejected a bid by the four largest U.S. airlines to dismiss nationwide antitrust litigation by passengers who accused them of conspiring to raise fares by keeping seating capacity artificially low.

In a decision late Friday afternoon, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly said she could “reasonably infer the existence of a conspiracy” among American Airlines Group (AAL), Delta Air Lines (DAL), Southwest Airlines (LUV) and United Continental Holdings (UAL) to fix prices.

Kollar-Kotelly, who sits in Washington, D.C., did not rule on the merits of the proposed class-action case, which combines 105 lawsuits filed around the country and seeks triple damages.

The U.S. Department of Justice last year began its own probe into a possible conspiracy among the airlines, which, according to government data, command a roughly 69-percent domestic market share.

Passengers claimed that the conspiracy began in early 2009, and has resulted in higher fares and reduced flight choices.

American Airlines Plane Engine Flung Debris in Rare, Risky Failure

They said the conspiracy, together with low fuel prices and higher fees for checking bags and other services, helped the airlines post a record $21.7 billion combined profit in 2015.

The airlines said the litigation should be dismissed because there was no proof of an agreement to collude, or that they reduced capacity in tandem.

But in her 41-page decision, Kollar-Kotelly pointed to statements by several airline executives about the need for “discipline” in seating capacity.

“Starting in 2009, the industry experienced limited capacity growth,” the judge wrote. “Notably, as defendants’ executives acknowledged, this restriction on growing capacity was a marked change within the industry. The court is satisfied that at this stage, plaintiffs sufficiently pled parallel conduct.”

Kollar-Kotelly said this was true even for Southwest, though its use of a single aircraft type and other factors gave it a “limited ability” to reduce capacity.

For more on plane ticket prices, watch:

American spokesman Matt Miller called the plaintiffs’ claims “plainly deficient,” and said the carrier is confident they will be found meritless.

Delta had no immediate comment. Southwest spokesman Brad Hawkins declined to comment. United did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Michael Hausfeld, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, called the decision a “substantial victory” for passengers. “We look forward to moving forward aggressively to secure the relief the public deserves,” he added.

The case is In re: Domestic Airline Travel Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, No. 15-mc-01404.