• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
FinanceInvesting

Stocks that are powered by the dividend payout  

By
Janice Revell
Janice Revell
and
Tom Ziegler
Tom Ziegler
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Janice Revell
Janice Revell
and
Tom Ziegler
Tom Ziegler
Down Arrow Button Icon
June 2, 2014, 10:21 AM ET
David Schwen for Fortune

Investors are starved for income. That’s the reality of the low-interest-rate world we’ve been living in. And with bond yields once again sliding lower — as of mid-May, the 10-year Treasury yield had dropped to 2.5% — the demand for payouts is driving up prices for dividend stocks. The FTSE High Dividend Yield index has gained 3.3% so far in 2014, compared with 1.9% for the broader S&P 500. The highest-yielding stock sectors, like REITs and utilities, have racked up double-digit gains. Experts say it’s not too late to juice your portfolio with dividend stocks. But rather than seeking out the highest yielders, the key is to target companies with a long history of hiking their dividends.

There’s ample evidence to show that investing in dividend growers is a smart strategy over time. Consider that during the 40-year period ended in 2013, the dividend-paying stocks within the S&P 500 index generated a total return of 9.3% annually, handily beating the 2.3% return for nonpayers, according to Ned Davis Research. But stocks with the very highest dividend yields produced annual returns that were, on average, about 1.5 percentage points lower than those of lower-yielding but consistently growing dividend payers. Why? Very high dividend yields are often a result of a beaten-down stock price and an indicator that investors are worried about the company’s prospects.

Among the 75% or so of Fortune 500 companies that currently pay a dividend, Johnson & Johnson, No. 39 on this year’s list and the world’s largest health care company, stands out as a stellar dividend grower. The maker of prescription drugs and medical devices — along with products like Band-Aids and Listerine — has increased its dividend for 52 consecutive years and currently sports a yield of 2.8%. A $1,000 investment in Johnson & Johnson’s stock (JNJ) at the beginning of 1980 would be worth more than $94,000 today, assuming reinvestment of dividends. More than a third of the total return over that period came from dividends.

Strong cash generation should allow JNJ to keep those dividends coming. Citigroup analyst Matthew Dodds, who rates the stock a buy, points out that even during the height of the financial crisis the company’s pharma R&D spending never dipped below 20% of sales. That strategy is paying off: During the most recent quarter JNJ’s pharmaceutical sales rose by almost 11%, thanks largely to new products introduced since 2008. The stock trades at about 17 times expected 2014 earnings, in line with most large pharma competitors.

An easy way to gain broader exposure to dividend growers is to buy an exchange-traded fund, such as the recently launched ProShares S&P 500 Aristocrats, which tracks the 54 large companies that have raised their dividends every year for at least 25 years. The Aristocrats index has returned 21.6% annually over the past five years, easily beating the broader S&P 500’s 18.7% return. Top holdings of the ETF, which carries a low 0.35% expense ratio, include Johnson & Johnson, Exxon Mobil (XOM), and Procter & Gamble (PG). An investment in dividend growers won’t guarantee smooth sailing. But when the payout keeps rising, it adds up to a big advantage over time.

This story is from the June 16, 2014 issue of  Fortune.

About the Authors
By Janice Revell
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
By Tom Ziegler
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Finance

picture of two bitcoins
CryptoBitcoin
Bitcoin bounces back more than 10% after brutal week
By Carlos GarciaDecember 3, 2025
7 minutes ago
Rich woman lounging on boat
SuccessWealth
The wealthy 1% are turning to new status symbols that can’t be bought—and it’s hurting Dior, Versace, and Burberry
By Emma BurleighDecember 3, 2025
15 minutes ago
Greg Abbott and Sundar Pichai sit next to each other at a red table.
AITech Bubble
Bank of America predicts an ‘air pocket,’ not an AI bubble, fueled by mountains of debt piling up from the data center rush
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 3, 2025
1 hour ago
Dell
Personal FinanceWhite House
Why the government is really going to give your baby $1,000, collecting interest until they turn 18
By Moriah Balingit and The Associated PressDecember 3, 2025
3 hours ago
Bessent
BankingFederal Reserve
‘We’re going to veto them’: Bessent backs new rules to give White House more power over Federal Reserve
By Christopher Rugaber and The Associated PressDecember 3, 2025
3 hours ago
Bessent
Economyphilanthropy
Scott Bessent calls the Giving Pledge well-intentioned but ‘very amorphous,’ growing from ‘a panic among the billionaire class’
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 3, 2025
3 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
North America
Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos commit $102.5 million to organizations combating homelessness across the U.S.: ‘This is just the beginning’
By Sydney LakeDecember 2, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Ford workers told their CEO 'none of the young people want to work here.' So Jim Farley took a page out of the founder's playbook
By Sasha RogelbergNovember 28, 2025
5 days ago
placeholder alt text
North America
Anonymous $50 million donation helps cover the next 50 years of tuition for medical lab science students at University of Washington
By The Associated PressDecember 2, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
C-Suite
MacKenzie Scott's $19 billion donations have turned philanthropy on its head—why her style of giving actually works
By Sydney LakeDecember 2, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Warren Buffett used to give his family $10,000 each at Christmas—but when he saw how fast they were spending it, he started buying them shares instead
By Eleanor PringleDecember 2, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Elon Musk says he warned Trump against tariffs, which U.S. manufacturers blame for a turn to more offshoring and diminishing American factory jobs
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 2, 2025
1 day ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.