• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

The difference between U.S. and China’s credit booms

By
Scott Cendrowski
Scott Cendrowski
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Scott Cendrowski
Scott Cendrowski
Down Arrow Button Icon
January 30, 2014, 6:00 PM ET

FORTUNE — Just before China shuts down for the next week for the Chinese New Year, independent research firm GK Dragonomics has released a fascinating report for people worried about China’s latest shadow banking product. We’re talking about so-called wealth management products, retail investments that pay higher yields than deposits. One of them was named Credit Equals Gold No. 1 and needed a state bailout this month after failing to repay loans to wealthy investors.

What Dragonomics’ Joyce Poon observes is that U.S. and Chinese banks are quite similar in how they schemed to push lending off their books and avoid loan-to-deposit limits. During the U.S. credit buildup of the mid-2000s, the product was CDOs. In China, it’s wealth management products, or WMP, which grew 40% to $1.66 trillion from late 2012 to Sept. 2013, says Poon.

Poon writes the key contrast between the booms in U.S. and China is as follows:

“The big difference between the two economies is that China’s non-bank lending does not involve genuine securitization. In the U.S., risk got fully dispersed from bank balance sheets and collateral was used multiple times further down the securitization chain for funding. Of course, during the 2008-09 crisis, U.S. banks were forced to take many non-performing assets back on balance sheet. The difference in China is perhaps that banks have no illusions about the ultimate recourse to them. Measured in these terms, China’s systematic risk remains within reasonable limits.”

You can judge those reasonable limits for yourself:

Poon goes on to say that private sector credit in China is fully funded by domestic savings, which continue to grow. Compared to the leverage U.S. banks built up during the 2000s via securitization, not backed by adequate capital, China looks better.

The conclusion is that WMPs won’t bring down the Chinese economy. But it is true that they are a symptom of a bigger problem: Banks are skirting the Chinese government’s intentions to reduce risky lending. It seems the government still has a long way to go.

About the Author
By Scott Cendrowski
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
3 hours ago
Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
6 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
6 hours ago
InvestingStock
What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks
By Julien Ponthus, Natalia Kniazhevich, Abhishek Vishnoi and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
Macron warns EU may hit China with tariffs over trade surplus
By James Regan and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
U.S. trade chief says China has complied with terms of trade deals
By Hadriana Lowenkron and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Uncategorized
Transforming customer support through intelligent AI operations
By Lauren ChomiukNovember 26, 2025
11 days ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.