• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

The next generation of pre-IPO financing?

By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
October 23, 2012, 6:17 PM ET

FORTUNE — I recently wrote about private equity’s golden hangover, or the glut of large-cap companies that remain in PE portfolios after being acquired between 2005 and 2008. Conventional wisdom is that many of these companies are planning 2013 IPOs, but such offerings can face serious challenges. Namely, that capital raise targets are tied tightly to debt repayment.

Here’s what I mean: Imagine a company has $5 billion in long-term debt and files for a $2 billion IPO, with all of the proceeds earmarked for debt reduction. If the company raises $2 billion or more, all is good. But if the company only can fill $1.5 billion, prospective buyers would be getting a company with a half billion dollars of extra debt on the books. It’s the sort of thing that could cause such folks to walk away, or insist on a much lower price per share. At the very least, it severely reduces issuer flexibility.

One strategy I’m hearing about for easing this burden is to ask long-term public equity investors – the Fidelity Investments and T. Rowe Prices (TROW) of the world – for large pre-IPO capital infusions that are used to preemptively repay debt. These would be investors who otherwise would buy at IPO, but now they get to come in early at a 10% or 15% discount (plus equity re-pricing triggers related to any changes in IPO timing). Suddenly, the issuer and its private equity sponsors have some more IPO wiggle-room.

Yes, this does sound a bit like a shell game (since the buyer planned to come in later anyway, and now won’t buy shares at IPO). But it should make the issuer more attractive to other buyers, because the issuer has less debt. Moreover, it gives the company more of a fighting chance to list.

I’m told this strategy has been employed at least once so far, and that a number of large buyout firms are beginning to consider it. Could be a major trend to watch, particularly as the golden hangover begins to subside next year…

Sign up for Dan’s daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com

About the Author
By Dan Primack
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.