• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Will Bank of America execs get to keep their bonuses?

By
Eleanor Bloxham
Eleanor Bloxham
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Eleanor Bloxham
Eleanor Bloxham
Down Arrow Button Icon
July 1, 2011, 9:44 AM ET

By Eleanor Bloxham, contributor

FORTUNE — What would happen to you if you made an $8.5 billion “mistake” or


contributed to one at your job?

Bank of America’s (BAC) recently proposed $8.5 billion settlement with investors in its mortgage-backed securities certainly amounts to a decent chunk of change. Even so, some may argue it’s rather small, given the damage that executives caused by not accurately disclosing the contents of the securities they sold.

But this $8.5 billion settlement — in real cash, not just paper accounting losses — brings some very large questions to the fore. What about all the executives who made bonuses based on the sale of those securities? And what about the executives who conducted the due diligence on Bank of America’s purchase of Countrywide, which led them to take on this multi-billion dollar headache?

Should those executives have received the pay days and bonuses they received?

The Dodd-Frank Act requires so-called clawbacks for accounting restatements. Clawbacks force executives to return bonus monies if they were based on false financial statements and that accounting has to be restated later on.

But the financials aren’t going to be restated in this case. And since this settlement does not involve a restatement, according to Bank of American spokesperson Jerry Dubrowski, no prior bonuses will be affected. Whether current executives will have to pay this year for the sins of the past “is too early to say,” Dubrowski says.

So, what about these large “oops” moments? The ones that take several years to materialize? Is there no accountability for these mistakes? Just take the money and run?

Shouldn’t those responsible for the losses be the ones to take a hit to their full bonus payments?

Clearly, they should, and that’s why pay rules currently being considered and discussed by multiple bank regulators are so important.

At the very least, the new proposals should require banks to do the following:

  • Measure the risks of different products — and share that information with a bank’s board so it can assess the riskiness of different business lines, and
  • Implement bonus deferrals — so executives have to wait to be paid the full amount of their bonuses. Bonus deferrals help ensure that pay is made on an accurate performance assessment and that there aren’t any billion dollar “oops” moments lurking in the background. It’s not like major settlements and penalties in banking are such a rarity these days.

You wouldn’t expect to keep huge bonuses in the land of billion dollar errors – or would you? Let’s hope some common sense prevails.

Eleanor Bloxham is CEO of The Value Alliance and Corporate Governance Alliance (http://thevaluealliance.com), a board advisory firm.  

About the Author
By Eleanor Bloxham
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
0

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Success
Apple cofounder Ronald Wayne sold his 10% stake for $800 in 1976—today it’d be worth up to $400 billion
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs are taxes and they were used to finance the federal government until the 1913 income tax. A top economist breaks it down
By Kent JonesDecember 12, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The Fed just ‘Trump-proofed’ itself with a unanimous move to preempt a potential leadership shake-up
By Jason MaDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple CEO Tim Cook out-earns the average American’s salary in just 7 hours—to put that into context, he could buy a new $439,000 home in just 2 days
By Emma BurleighDecember 12, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
For the first time since Trump’s tariff rollout, import tax revenue has fallen, threatening his lofty plans to slash the $38 trillion national debt
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.