• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Internet Brands deal comes from old money

By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
September 20, 2010, 2:32 PM ET

Hellman & Friedman this morning announced that it has agreed to buy Internet Brands, the online publisher that began life 12 years ago as Idealab-backed CarsDirect.com. I plan to delve deeper into the actual deal later today, but right now just a quick note on Hellman & Friedman’s participation:

It would appear that H&F will do this deal out of its sixth fund, an $8.4 billion vehicle closed in 2006, rather than the $8.8 billion pool raised in late 2009. In fact, the firm still hasn’t spent a dime of that new money. For the uninitiated, it is very unusual for private equity firms to sit on new funds for more than a year …

The explanation here comes from an investor in both Funds VI and VII. He reminds us that H&F was very close to buying Neuberger Berman in late 2008, which would have “sucked down a lot of Fund VI.” H&F bailed out of that deal a few months later, thanks to an out tied to S&P 500 performance. By that time, however, it had already committed itself to raising new capital.

“They were very open about the timing starting Fund VII during the process,” says the investor.

According to data from CalPERS, H&F VI was only around 70% called through the end of Q1. That would mean around $2.52 billion left in dry powder. (Yes, I’m ignoring the possibility that CalPERS’ cash-in figure includes annual management fees.)  Since then, it has announced three deals: Internet Brands ($640 million), Associated Materials ($1.3 billion) and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc. ($1.1 billion, together with Stone Point Capital).

Let’s assume that each of those deals included a 40% equity check from H&F (or 20% in the case of SCMS, because the equity was syndicated). That would mean around $776 million in new equity commitments, bringing the remaining dry powder to around $1.75 billion.

The firm probably wants to hold onto at least $750 million for follow-ons or other special situations, which means there is about $1 billion to go. Sounds to me like Fund VII won’t see its first deal until at least the first quarter of 2011, or 15 months after it closed. Guess this was the mega-fund to invest in if you were having liquidity troubles …

About the Author
By Dan Primack
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
3 hours ago
Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
InvestingStock
What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks
By Julien Ponthus, Natalia Kniazhevich, Abhishek Vishnoi and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
Macron warns EU may hit China with tariffs over trade surplus
By James Regan and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
U.S. trade chief says China has complied with terms of trade deals
By Hadriana Lowenkron and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
15 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.