Apple’s toxic hellstew by Philip Elmer-DeWitt @FortuneMagazine July 27, 2015, 3:32 PM EDT E-mail Tweet Facebook Google Plus Linkedin Share icons Apple moved quickly to contain the damage done by Jim Dalrymple’s report Wednesday that Apple’s new music streaming service had swallowed a huge chuck—roughly 4,700 songs—of his digital music collection. “Apple music is a nightmare, and I’m done with it,” Dalrymple tweeted to his 35,000 Twitter followers. Then, with the loss still fresh in his mind, he recorded a two-hour podcast with John Gruber for The Dalrymple Report. We couldn’t wait to hear it. We never did. Before it aired, Apple intervened, and that portion of the podcast was redacted. “It’s been an interesting and confusing day,” Dalrymple wrote late Friday. “I arrived at Apple this morning to talk to them about my issues with Apple Music and to hopefully fix my problems. The good news is that I have about 99 percent of my music back.” That’s nice for Dalrymple. But Apple Music’s problems—and Apple’s PR nightmare—continue. On Monday, an iOS developer with an even bigger following (84,000 on Twitter) picked up where Dalrymple left off. “The iTunes Store back-end is a toxic hellstew of unreliability,” wrote Marco Arment, slyly echoing Tim Cook’s 2014 characterization of Android’s growing malware problem. “With the introduction of Apple Music,” Arment continued, “Apple confusingly introduced a confusing service backed by the iTunes Store that’s confusingly integrated into iTunes and the iOS Music app (don’t even get me started on that) and partially, maybe, mostly replaces the also very confusing and historically unreliable iTunes Match. “So iTunes is a toxic hellstew of technical cruft and a toxic hellstew of UI design, in the middle of a transition between two partly redundant cloud services, both of which are confusing and vague to most people about which songs of theirs are in the cloud, which are safe to delete, and which ones they actually have. “Even Jim’s follow-up piece, after meeting privately with Apple in PR-damage-control mode, is confusing at best about what actually might have happened, which is completely understandable because it sounds like even Apple isn’t sure.” Even MacDailyNews, reliably in Apple’s corner in almost every dispute, piled on: “iTunes screams to be broken up into separate, streamlined apps. It’s been screaming that for years. But Apple seems to be scared silly to do so—perhaps 800+ million credit cards have something to do with it—so they’ve tinkered around the edges, making questionable tweaks here and there and bolting on even more bloat. Grow a pair, Apple, and do what needs to be done already.” Ouch. Follow Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Twitter at @philiped. Read his Apple AAPL coverage at fortune.com/ped or subscribe via his RSS feed.