• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Apple

Apple and GT have agreed to an ‘amicable parting of the ways’

By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
October 21, 2014, 7:37 PM ET

GT Advanced Technologies (GTATQ) announced in a Springfield, Mass., bankruptcy court Tuesday that it had signed an agreement with Apple Inc., its largest creditor.

Under the terms of the deal, GT will retain ownership of 2,036 furnaces in Mesa, Arizona, that it was using to grow sapphire crystals for the screens and lenses of Apple devices. Over the next year, GT will attempt to sell those furnaces and use the proceeds from those sales — if any — to pay its debt to Apple.

Apple, for its part, has agreed to accept an undisclosed portion of those proceeds as full settlement of GT’s debt to Apple, currently valued at $439 million, and waiving all other claims against its former subcontractor.

Luc Despins, an attorney representing GT, described the arrangement as “an amicable parting of the ways.”

“This is extremely good news for the estate,” he said. “It will save millions of dollars.”

In an earlier filing GT claimed it was losing $1.5 million every day it had to keep the plant running.

What went wrong with the GT-Apple deal — hailed less than a year ago as a shot in the arm for both GT and the state of Arizona — is still a mystery.

As a condition of the settlement, certain documents that Apple has been fighting to keep out of the public record — including the original contract and an affidavit filed by GT chief operating officer Daniel Squiller — would remain sealed and all copies of the so-called Supplemental Squiller Declaration “(paper or electronic)” destroyed.

That didn’t sit well with some of three dozen lawyers in the room, including the assistant attorney general of New Hampshire, where GT is headquartered, and a lawyer representing Dow Jones, publisher of the Wall Street Journal. Both argued that the public had a right to know why hundreds of workers are being laid off and creditors owed millions of dollars are being asked to accept a fraction of what they are owed.

At issue, according to Dow Jones, is whether Apple’s nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) — enforced, we learned from this case, by damages of $50 million per violation — trump the public’s and the creditors’ right to know.

At the end of the day, Judge Henry Boroff gave GT the green light to begin winding down its Mesa operations. But it’s not clear whether he’s changed his mind about the Squiller Declaration. At a hearing last week he warned Apple that he was inclined to unseal it.

By cutting this deal with GT, Apple may have found a way to avoid that.

Follow Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Twitter at @philiped. Read his Apple (AAPL) coverage at fortune.com/ped or subscribe via his RSS feed.

About the Author
By Philip Elmer-DeWitt
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.