When a company brings thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in economic activity to a city or state, its CEO gains a powerful bargaining chip with the government. Knowing when to use that power requires the kind of judgment that increasingly defines the corner office, weighing political influence against the interests of employees, the needs of the business, and the company’s ties to the place it calls home.
CEOs are increasingly making the economic stakes explicit, tying decisions about jobs and future investment to clashes over taxes, regulation, social policy, and corporate deals.
Paramount Skydance CEO David Ellison raised the prospect of leaving California amid the legal fight over the company’s Warner Bros. Discovery deal. Citadel founder Ken Griffin warned that future growth could favor Miami amid a clash with New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Elon Musk moved the headquarters of SpaceX and X to Texas after criticizing a California law concerning transgender students.
Corporate America has wielded this kind of influence for decades. In 1964, Coca-Cola used its economic clout in Atlanta to pressure the city’s business establishment to attend a dinner honoring Martin Luther King Jr. What has changed since then is CEOs’ growing willingness to make the stakes public, openly connecting jobs and investment to policymakers’ decisions.
Still, a relocation threat only works if it’s credible. A company needs somewhere else to go and must be prepared to leave. Following through, however, can come at a steep cost.
Companies rooted in industry clusters can be especially difficult to move. Hollywood’s century-old entertainment ecosystem, for example, cannot simply be recreated elsewhere. Relocation can also mean losing skilled employees unwilling to uproot their lives, along with institutional knowledge and employee trust.
Governments have plenty at stake too. UC Berkeley economist Enrico Moretti estimates that every tech job lost can cost a community another four to five local jobs, giving elected officials a powerful incentive to keep major employers in place.
The strategic challenge for CEOs is knowing the strength of the hand they are holding before playing it. Jobs and investment can provide formidable negotiating power, but putting them on the table can expose just how much a company depends on the people and places it is threatening to leave.
Read the full magazine article in Fortune’s October/November 2026 issue.
Ruth Umoh
ruth.umoh@fortune.com
Smarter in seconds
Candidate control. Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky says he spends three hours a day on recruitment—and if his hiring managers don’t like his input, he tells them to leave
Leadership lesson
P&G’s CEO on why he’s hiring more brand builders: “You need to do social listening every day. What are people saying on social media? What does it mean? Are you getting any insights out of that?
News to know
Palo Alto Networks CEO Nikesh Arora is emerging as a trusted adviser to CEOs confronting a new generation of AI-powered cyber threats. Fortune
Tom Cruise suffered one of his worst box-office debuts as brutal reviews prompted Warner Bros. to mount an unusual ad campaign. Fortune
The U.S. abruptly pulled 12 B-1 bombers from England after new threats of an Iran-backed plot against the air base. NYT
A lawsuit alleges Red Lobster’s disastrous $20 endless shrimp promotion was a deliberate scheme that helped push the seafood chain into bankruptcy. Fortune
President Trump touted data centers as an economic boon for Ohio, but his pitch drew a muted response from the rally crowd. Fortune
Companies are warning workers about layoffs long before revealing who will lose their jobs. WSJ