Behind those familiar, surging hooks lies something far more useful to today’s corporate leaders than a retro playlist: a deliberate, road-tested method for turning other people’s ideas into work that sounds unmistakably like your own.

Sedaka once summarized his approach with a line that would make modern corporate intellectual property lawyers wince: “It’s not stealing. It’s called inspiration.” He was remarkably candid about listening closely to the timbres, harmonies, and rhythmic feels of other artists, and then seamlessly weaving those elements into his own compositions. Yet he set a strict internal bar: the result had to “top” the source and still sound undeniably like Sedaka.

That tension between borrowing and originality is precisely where many companies stumble today. Executive teams study competitors, track adjacent industries, and mine social media trends, and then either copy too literally or reject useful lessons entirely in the name of being “original.”

Call it the Sedaka Method: listen widely, borrow openly, and work until the result sounds like something only you could have created. In a business environment where ideas move freely, differentiation is fragile, and the line between inspiration and imitation is easily blurred by generative AI, this method offers a practical masterclass in corporate strategy.

The training behind the method

Sedaka didn’t arrive at this method by accident. Trained at Juilliard and forged in the high-pressure Brill Building song factory, he spent his early years writing to order. He tailored melodies to specific singers, built hooks that fit rigid radio formats, and revised on tight deadlines. That training gave him a repeatable, scalable process long before he began talking publicly about “inspiration.”

Take “Love Will Keep Us Together,” the song that powered the Captain & Tennille to a Grammy and cemented Sedaka’s reputation for a new generation. Sedaka was explicit about drawing on the feel and textures of records he admired. He aimed for something that captured the market’s emotional energy while turning up the melodic and structural sophistication that had always been his signature.

Later in his career, Sedaka revisited “Breaking Up Is Hard to Do,” the brisk 1962 hit that defined his early sound. Encouraged by another artist’s slower interpretation and by live-audience feedback, he reimagined it as a languid, jazz-inflected ballad, and scored a second massive hit with the same song more than a decade later. He changed the tempo, harmony, and emotional temperature without losing the core melodic identity. The market rewarded him for recomposition, not reinvention.

These episodes reveal three consistent rules of the Sedaka Method that every executive can apply when scanning competitors, considering best practices, or revisiting legacy products.

Rule 1: Treat competitors as your listening room, not your blueprint

Most leadership teams conduct some version of competitive listening. They monitor rivals’ product launches, track pricing shifts, and dissect customer messaging. The critical question is what they do with what they hear.

Sedaka listened widely, but he converted what he heard into raw material for his own creative process. He paid attention to the grooves working for other artists, then asked: What can I do with these elements that will feel fresh and align with my own sensibility? He didn’t deny influence; he made it an explicit input into a process governed by his own constraints.

The Strategic Equivalent: Decompose a rival’s move into its separate parts—offering, channel, pricing, service model.

The Execution: Decide which pieces belong in your context, and critically how they must be transformed before reaching your customers.

When Apple studied Xerox PARC’s graphical interface work, it didn’t replicate the Alto. It rebuilt the concept around a different user, a different price point, and an entirely different vision of personal computing. That is “listening room” thinking, not blueprint thinking.

Rule 2: Protect your voice—even when you write for others

Sedaka often wrote for specific performers, tailoring songs to their unique vocal ranges and public personas. Yet listeners could instantly tell when they were hearing a Sedaka composition. His melodic contours, harmonic choices, and lyrical sensibility formed a recognizable “voice” that persisted across changing arrangements and interpreters.

Companies face a parallel challenge when adapting to new markets, implementing new technologies, or forming partnerships: how do you evolve without losing the core of who you are?

The discipline here requires defining a short list of non-negotiables before borrowing: mission, values, and distinctive capabilities. Then, you must stress-test every “inspired” initiative against them. Ask your team: will this still sound like us to our customers, employees, and investors?

Consider Costco’s navigation of retail disruption. It has adopted new technologies and expanded into e-commerce, but every move reinforces its core voice: membership value, curated selection, and relentless cost discipline. The voice stays recognizable even as the arrangement changes.

Rule 3: Recompose your own hits before the market does

The ballad version of “Breaking Up Is Hard to Do” is a case study in strategic recomposition. Sedaka took a familiar, aging asset, stripped it down, and re-presented it to connect with a new audience under new market conditions. He didn’t abandon the original, nor did he cling to it unchanged.

Many organizations have equivalent “hits”—the cornerstone products, services, or business models that defined them in an earlier era. Netflix didn’t abandon its identity when it moved from DVD-by-mail to streaming to original content; it recomposed around the same core insight (that consumers would pay for convenient, personalized access to entertainment) while radically changing the delivery. The leaders who fail at this are the ones who either freeze the arrangement (Blockbuster) or abandon the melody entirely.

To execute this, identify which elements of a legacy offering still resonate, consider how shifts in technology call for a different arrangement, and pilot a recomposition before a crisis forces your hand.

Learning from artists withour romanticizing them

Borrowing a strategic vocabulary from a pop songwriter might seem like a stretch in a corporate world governed by KPI dashboards and SEC filings. But business strategy is inherently a creative act. Leaders must sift through competing signals, incorporate others’ ideas, and still deliver something coherent and distinct. Sedaka’s career proves this can be done consciously, ethically, and highly profitably.

His example also carries a timely warning. When he said, “It’s not stealing,” he was describing a mindset dependent on the honest acknowledgment of influence and a relentless commitment to surpassing it, not simply matching it. In a business era where allegations of IP theft escalate quickly, and generative AI can remix a competitor’s work at scale in seconds, that distinction is the difference between market leadership and obsolescence.

For today’s executives, the challenge is building a culture where teams are encouraged to listen widely, borrow selectively, and do the hard work of recomposition. That means rewarding not only the “big new idea,” but the thoughtful rearrangement of existing ones.

As data shows a resurgent interest in Neil Sedaka’s song catalog, it is natural to focus on the melodies we already know by heart. But for business leaders, the enduring lesson lies in how those melodies came to be: how a creator steeped in other people’s sounds insisted on making them his own. In an era of constant strategic noise, the companies that thrive will be those that, like Sedaka, can listen widely and still be heard in their own unmistakable voice.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.