Paramount already faces an imposing collection of headwinds: shifting legal counsel, declining cable subscriptions, a fragile architecture of financing and an impending “ticking fee” that will increase the cost of delay. But the company’s greatest challenge in the year ahead may be time itself. As Vince Lombardi reportedly said after a close loss: “We didn’t lose the game; we just ran out of time.” Hollywood has seen this movie before, and only a decade ago. 

AT&T announced its agreement to acquire Time Warner in October 2016. The Justice Department sued to block the transaction in November 2017, forcing the companies into a lengthy legal battle before AT&T finally completed the acquisition in June 2018.

While AT&T and Time Warner fought in court and then struggled to integrate their operations, an emboldened Disney moved with greater strategic clarity. Disney announced its agreement to acquire most of 21st Century Fox in December 2017, completed the acquisition in March 2019 and launched Disney+ that November. HBO Max did not launch until May 2020.

The significance was not merely that Disney’s service arrived six months earlier. Disney had used the Fox acquisition to strengthen its content library, assume control of Hulu and build a clear consumer proposition around Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars and National Geographic.

WarnerMedia spent much of the same period reorganizing, debating how to protect HBO while broadening its appeal, and attempting to reconcile the cultures and priorities of a telephone company and a Hollywood studio. The service later moved through a confusing sequence of identities — HBO Max, Max and ultimately HBO Max again — reflecting a strategic uncertainty that its competitors were happy to exploit.

Of course, the Justice Department did not cause all of AT&T’s problems. The transaction contained fundamental flaws, and AT&T eventually reversed course by off-loading WarnerMedia and combining it with Discovery. But the regulatory delay consumed time and management attention during a crucial period in the development of streaming. More importantly, it allowed the market to move before the combined company was ready to move with it.

Paramount Skydance should take heed.

The company may ultimately defeat the lawsuit seeking to block its acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. Its lawyers may persuade the court that the transaction will create a stronger competitor to Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, Apple and other technology giants increasingly dominating the entertainment business. The deal could still close largely as envisioned. But even if Paramount wins in court, it may discover that its victory is Pyrrhic and comes too late.

Last week’s postponement removes the immediate threat of an injunction hearing, but it introduces the more unpredictable threat of a prolonged period of stasis while the industry around the companies continues to change.

The agreement may improve Paramount’s procedural position. The states face a higher burden at a full trial than they would at a preliminary-injunction hearing. But the additional time also allows them to strengthen their evidence, refine their case and potentially attract additional state attorneys general to the challenge.

In media, time is not neutral. Delay does not preserve the competitive landscape. It allows rivals to invest, consolidate, launch products and capture customers while the companies waiting to merge remain preoccupied with lawyers, regulators and contingency plans. That is especially dangerous because the Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery transaction is not simply a collection of attractive entertainment assets. It is an ambitious and highly leveraged attempt to create enough scale to compete in a market increasingly controlled by companies with much larger balance sheets.

Paramount has secured commitments for approximately $54 billion in debt financing for the acquisition. At the end of 2025, Warner Bros. Discovery itself carried more than $32 billion in debt. The transaction therefore cannot easily withstand a long strategic pause. Its financial logic depends upon quickly integrating operations, generating efficiencies and producing cash.

As the costs of delay mount, the pressure may not come only from the courtroom. Investors may eventually begin asking whether the transaction still makes financial sense on its original terms. A significant portion of the cash needed to support the transaction is expected to come from businesses that are already deteriorating.

The cable networks inside Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery — including brands such as MTV, Comedy Central, CNN, TNT, TBS and Discovery — still generate valuable revenue and cash flow. But the traditional pay-TV bundle continues to shrink as consumers cancel cable subscriptions and advertisers follow audiences toward digital platforms. Each additional month means fewer subscribers, lower advertising revenue and less financial flexibility. The assets being counted upon to help carry the debt may become less productive while Paramount waits for permission to combine them.

Meanwhile, the streaming battle will not pause. Netflix will continue to add subscribers, refine its advertising business and expand into live programming. Amazon and Apple can continue financing entertainment as part of much larger corporate ecosystems. Disney can further integrate Disney+, Hulu and ESPN. YouTube will continue consuming an increasing share of television viewing without conforming to Hollywood’s traditional definitions of either a studio or a network. All the while, AI will continue to be integrated into the creative and technology stacks of these companies, potentially changing how content is developed, produced, marketed and distributed.

Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery, by contrast, will be forced to operate in a state of strategic limbo. Management teams must continue running their companies independently while knowing that departments, platforms and positions may eventually be combined. Investment decisions become more complicated. Employees become uncertain. Valuable executives and creative talent become easier for competitors to recruit.

The companies will also be unable to offer consumers the integrated streaming product that forms part of the transaction’s strategic rationale. Paramount’s vision presumably includes some combination of Paramount+ and HBO Max. But until the transaction closes, the companies cannot fully integrate those services, rationalize their offerings or deliver the benefits they have promised regulators and investors.

Like AT&T before it, Paramount may have the patience and resources to endure a lengthy legal battle. What it cannot recover is lost strategic momentum.

Ultimately, Paramount may not lose—it may just run out of time.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.