It was a battle that speculators couldn’t look away from, even if it made markets nervous to see politics seeping into the Fed’s corridors (literally—Trump’s visit to the Fed in July was only the fourth in U.S. history of the independent central bank).

The pressure from Trump may not have been as effective as he’d hoped, with the base rate still at 3.75 to 4%, but the attention on the central bank has remained. On a near-daily basis, markets are reacting to hints dropped by regional Federal Reserve bank presidents, Fed governors, FOMC meeting notes, and data which may color the decision-making of the group.

And while members of the FOMC warn investors against reading into their apparent “hints” too closely, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is calling time on the influence these individuals now wield.

“I think it’s time for the Fed to just move back into the background like it used to do, calm things down, and work for the American people, set monetary policy on a good path,” Bessent told CNBC. “This isn’t sport, it’s people’s lives.”

The FOMC itself would bristle at the implication that it has become gamified. In exclusive interviews with Fortune, regional bank presidents made it clear that their focus is on serving the American populace. As Boston Fed president Susan Collins told Fortune a year ago, any given FOMC decision “impacts individuals and their families and the communities that they live in. It impacts micro firms [and] individual entrepreneurs all the way up to our global multinational corporations.

“In order to have an environment that sustains rising living standards for our citizens, sustaining a low stable inflation and an environment with maximum employment really matters for all of us. That is what the FOMC is charged by Congress to do. That’s our job.”

Bessent isn’t such a fan of members of the FOMC speaking so freely on the base interest rate. He said: “I think we just need to calm down all these speeches by bank presidents that are just redundant. Why don’t they actually just come out and talk about the meaningful issues [for] the American people, rather than the short-term view of the next meeting?”

One might argue that Fed presidents sharing their outlook on their dual mandate—the job market and affordability when it comes to inflation—is particularly meaningful to the American people.

Bessent also claimed some regional Fed presidents weren’t living according to the “design” of the Fed: “These regional presidents were supposed to be people from the district, and it was supposed to break the New York hold on the reserve banks.” Three or four presidents, he suggested, don’t live in their districts and “go out into the country and then come back on weekends.”

The Fed wants out of politics

Fed presidents previously told Fortune that they welcome public accountability and feedback, but are legally mandated to steer clear of the quagmire of politics.

Chairman Jerome Powell has repeatedly shared this message throughout 2025, even when goaded by Trump that he is making “political” decisions. Back in August, Powell said in a speech: “We’re a nonpolitical agency. We don’t want to be involved in politics in any way.”

He added: “Congress has, we believe, ordered us to conduct our business in a nonpolitical way at all times—not just some of the time. We never use our tools to support or oppose a political party, a politician, or any political outcome.”

Even when Trump and the Fed chair met, the message was reiterated. Following the meetup in May, the Fed said in a statement: “Chair Powell did not discuss his expectations for monetary policy, except to stress that the path of policy will depend entirely on incoming economic information and what that means for the outlook.”

Powell won’t have to field these questions for much longer, with his term coming to an end in the spring. On this, Bessent also had an update: The nomination for the next chairman could come before Christmas.