Trump’s trade war isn’t failing. It’s working, just not for the people who voted for it.
When Trump eliminated the de minimis exemption, four million packages daily lost duty-free status. That’s 92% of all cargo facing tariffs, and small businesses are drowning.
Eight major tariff adjustments in the past 12 months have created a policy whiplash that large corporations can navigate but small businesses cannot. Yet these policies assume corporate-level resources that small businesses simply don’t have, costing them $856,000 annually, while only 37% have access to business credit to weather these changes.
The policy whiplash costs
Small businesses represent 97% of all U.S. importers. Trump’s China tariff pause, extended twice beyond its original 90-day timeline, has left virtually all of them trapped in regulatory uncertainty where rules change faster than they can adapt.
The financial impact is precise and brutal. A family-run restaurant facing 40% ingredient cost increases has three impossible choices: absorb margin-killing costs, raise prices, or find non-existent domestic alternatives. For a typical small business generating about $1.2 million in annual revenue, even modest trade swings can erase 10%-15% of top-line income.
That volatility has become the new normal. Small firms plan around policy uncertainty as a baseline, despite lacking trade consultants, legal teams, and cash reserves that larger corporations use to navigate changes. Big companies can stockpile inventory ahead of tariff deadlines, diversify suppliers globally, and tap established credit lines to ride out chaos. Small businesses, without credit or capital, are forced into reactive decision-making with no cushion. Once again, the policies designed to protect them become weapons against them, strengthening the corporations they were meant to contain. Meanwhile, the small businesses that were supposed to benefit from an ‘America First’ trade policy find themselves priced out by the protection meant to help them.
The credit squeeze
The damage is not limited to higher inventory costs — policy volatility cuts off access to credit small businesses need most.
Banks demand multi-year business plans for credit approval, but trade policies change weekly. When tariffs on inputs can swing from 0% to 145% each quarter, financial projections become meaningless.
The result is a credit desert. Over half of small business owners report severe financial stress, but banks treat their volatile cost structures as evidence of mismanagement rather than symptoms of policy chaos. They’re penalised for unpredictable finances caused by policy whiplash.
Meanwhile, larger companies have the resources and established credit lines to weather any storm. Small businesses don’t.
Stockpile advantages
The credit crunch is only half the story. Many large corporations benefit from “stockpile strangulation” — bulk-ordering inventory before tariff deadlines, spreading customs fees across thousands of units and paying pennies per item.
Small businesses simply can’t afford to do this. A retailer who previously shipped $5 items now faces flat-fees of $80-$200 per package, making that $5 item cost $165 to deliver. The economics are brutal and inescapable. Without capital to play this game, small businesses are eliminated before they can compete
What banks must do
Banks lack systems that provide real-time market visibility. They already understand external shocks — ski resorts get different credit terms in summer because seasonal revenue drops are predictable business cycles, not management failures. Yet when tariffs force businesses to abandon forecasting because trade rules change weekly, lenders often misread the situation.
Many demand precise projections, treating volatile margins as red flags. Small businesses need financial partners who recognise that when the vast majority of importers face identical uncertainty, they’re looking at systemic market conditions rather than individual business problems.
The policy fix
Without accessible credit or reserves, small businesses are left reacting to policy shocks while larger competitors plan quarters ahead. They desperately need predictability. A 12–18 month tariff roadmap would let them plan strategically rather than gamble on tomorrow’s policy announcements. The administration favours negotiating flexibility over certainty, costing small-business survival. Large corporations already enjoy predictability through lobbying and insider intelligence; a public roadmap would level that playing field and remove unfair advantages created by chaos.
We’re measuring success wrong
Trade war defenders point to achievements: steel imports hit twenty-year lows, solar manufacturing doubled in Q1, and reshoring jumped 454%. These victories matter, but they mask deeper damage to the small businesses employing 46% of the private workforce.
Chaotic implementation exposes how vulnerable small businesses are to policy shocks, and when they contract, damage spreads. Workers lose jobs, labour markets weaken. Large companies can absorb the blows, but the dry cleaner, toy importer, or family-run retailer cannot.
The fundamental contradiction persists: trade protection succeeds only when protected businesses can benefit from it. Today, policies meant to strengthen American enterprise are eliminating the entrepreneurs who embody it. Small businesses drive nearly half the economy; they deserve better than being collateral damage in a trade war that works for everyone except them.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
