• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
PoliticsUkraine invasion
Europe

U.S. believes 75,000 Russian soldiers have been killed or injured in Ukraine, with over 80% of Putin’s land forces ‘bogged down and tired’

By
David Meyer
David Meyer
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
David Meyer
David Meyer
Down Arrow Button Icon
July 28, 2022, 7:13 AM ET
Russian President Vladimir Putin
Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during the Powerful Ideas For New Times Forum on July 20, 2022 in Moscow, Russia.Getty Images

More than 75,000 Russian soldiers have been killed or wounded in the country’s invasion of Ukraine, White House officials reportedly told lawmakers in a classified briefing.

Representative Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) told CNN Wednesday that the toll was “huge,” and the officials had also made it clear that “over 80% of [Russia’s] land forces are bogged down, and they’re tired.”

The update came just a week after CIA Director William Burns said an estimated 15,000 Russian soldiers had been killed, and 45,000 were likely wounded—it’s a military rule of thumb that the tally of wounded individuals outnumbers death tolls by three to one.

However, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy claimed on Tuesday that “nearly 40,000” Russian soldier had died in the war, and “tens of thousands more have been injured or maimed.”

Slotkin’s disclosure implies that somewhere around 19,000 Russians have lost their lives in the invasion by the aforementioned rule of thumb.

She was right to call that a huge toll.

Russia only launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine just over five months ago. When the Soviet-Afghan War ended after nine years in 1989, the official Soviet death toll was 15,000.

Russia sent at least 150,000 troops to Ukraine at the start of the war, so if the 75,000 figure is accurate, that’s as much as half the total deployed forces.

How accurate are these figures?

However, it is very difficult to get accurate death tolls from the Ukraine war, as is usually the case in times of conflict.

Civilian death tolls are hard to establish because independent human rights monitors often have trouble accessing massacre sites and interviewing people there—and “combatant deaths are particularly vulnerable to misinformation,” conflict researcher Shawn Davies told Fortune in March.

Moscow last gave its own estimate of dead Russian military personnel in late March, when authorities there said 1,351 had perished. However, a Russian court banned distribution of such information last month, claiming it amounted to revealing military secrets.

Ukraine isn’t exactly forthcoming about its own military death toll, either. Kyiv said in early June that around 10,000 of its fighters had lost their lives, with around 30,000 injured.

On Monday, the United Nations’ human rights commissioner said 5,237 civilians had been killed during the war—including 348 children—and 7,035 injured. That’s just verified deaths and injuries, however, and the U.N. said “the actual figures are considerably higher.”

The BBC reported Thursday that Russia’s offensive in eastern Ukraine had stalled, thanks to Western shipments of sophisticated weaponry to Kyiv.

Meanwhile, British defense and intelligence officials said Thursday that a Ukrainian counteroffensive in the south of the country had nearly isolated the Russian-occupied city of Kherson—if Ukraine re-takes that city, it will be severely embarrassing for Vladimir Putin’s regime.

UK MOD update- Ukraine’s counter-offensive in Kherson is gathering momentum. Their forces have highly likely established a bridgehead south of the Ingulets River, which forms the northern boundary of Russian-occupied Kherson. pic.twitter.com/YsSedQ5bAG

— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) July 28, 2022

“I think that what we heard very firmly from President Zelenskyy and reinforced today is that the Ukrainians really want to hit Russia in the teeth a few times before the winter comes, put them in the best position possible, particularly hitting them down south,” Slotkin told CNN.

She added that there was bipartisan support in the U.S. for sending Ukraine long-range ATACMS missiles.

However, the White House recently indicated that it’s not keen on that idea, because the Ukrainians could use the missiles to strike within Russian territory.

Sign up for the Fortune Features email list so you don’t miss our biggest features, exclusive interviews, and investigations.

About the Author
By David Meyer
LinkedIn icon
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.