Women with breast implants deserve to know more about what’s in their bodies

-A different kind of health concern. Today’s essay comes from our Fortune colleague Maria Aspan:

Early last year, one of my friends had a terrifying conversation with her doctor. In 2014, after her mother died of cancer and my friend discovered she carried a genetically high risk of eventually developing the disease, she had decided to protect herself with a preventative double mastectomy and reconstruction—“the Angelina Jolie surgery,” as she called it. Those procedures replaced her natural, cancer-prone breasts with implants that were supposed to be safer.

But five years later, my friend’s surgeon delivered a new warning: Her type of breast implants had been linked to a different sort of cancer, and the odds of getting it seemed to be getting worse. Suddenly, something that was supposed to help her physical and mental health was instead putting her at risk.

That’s a familiar refrain when it comes to breast implants, as I found in the course of a months-long investigation for Fortune’s June/July issue. Even though the devices have been on the market since the 1960s, and have been sold to more than 8 million American women since 2000, breast implants have been plagued by a long history of product recalls, lawsuits, government bans, and various health issues affecting the women who have them—up to and including death.

“There are a lot of women who are really suffering,” Diana Zuckerman, a scientist and president of the National Center for Health Research, told me. “You have these products that are widely, widely sold, and every few years we learn something new about the problems they cause.”

The most serious and sometimes fatal of those problems is a cancer of the immune system known as BIA-ALCL, for “breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.” More than 903 women have been diagnosed with the disease, which has been linked in academic studies to breast implants with a “textured” silicone shell, and more than 33 women have died from it. Women with textured implants made by Allergan, now owned by AbbVie, are at especially high risk of developing BIA-ALCL, according to the FDA, which in July asked the company to recall its textured implants from the market.

But, as I discovered when I started talking to women all over the U.S.—or, in one tragic case, to their survivors—Allergan’s recall didn’t fix all of the problems with breast implants. BIA-ALCL can sometimes take a decade or more to develop, as it did in the case of Paulette Parr, who died of the lymphoma last summer, at age 68. And it’s only one of many health complications that women with breast implants have been reporting for years.

Many of these concerns have long been ignored, or worse. Until 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration allowed manufacturers to report problems with their implants in a hidden, non-public database. Meanwhile, Allergan and its major competitors (Johnson & Johnson and Sientra) have all failed to comply with FDA requirements to study the long-term effects of their implants on women’s health. (In separate statements to Fortune, all three companies say that they prioritize patient safety.)

The FDA’s Binita Ashar told me that the agency is finalizing a black-box warning label for breast implants, and is prepared “to take further action if necessary to protect patients.” A week after we spoke, the FDA did just that, sending more warning letters to breast implant manufacturers over their compliance failures.

Some of the women I spoke with remain happy with their breast implants—or at least with the option to have them. For example, even after having another surgery last year to replace her textured implants, my friend says she doesn’t regret getting them. For her, the risks associated with breast implants remain much lower than her hereditary genetic risk of developing an aggressive breast cancer.

But it’s impossible to weigh those risks, and to give your informed consent to any sort of medical procedure, if you don’t have information on all of the known dangers. “Everybody loves their implants ‘until.’ My ‘until’ was 18 years,” says Carol Small, a breast cancer survivor who got a textured implant in 1999 and was diagnosed with BIA-ALCL in 2017. “We need to have good, informed choices.”

Read the full story here.

Maria Aspan
maria.aspan@fortune.com
@mariaaspan

Today’s Broadsheet was produced by Emma Hinchliffe. 

ALSO IN THE HEADLINES

- Record drop. Well, we said the number was ever-vacillating. Just a few hours after the Fortune 500 and our accompanying tally of female Fortune 500 CEOs published yesterday, car rental company Hertz said that its chief executive, Kathryn Marinello, would resign; her replacement is Paul Stone. That brings the number of female Fortune 500 CEOs down to 36, or 7.2%, compared to yesterday's 37. 

- Rescue mission. German Chancellor Angela Merkel, with French President Emmanuel Macron, proposed a plan to rescue EU member states from the economic crisis of the coronavirus pandemic. Under their proposal, the EU would borrow €500 billion on financial markets and distribute that money to the hardest-hit European economies. Guardian

- How to re-open. In the latest issue of the magazine, Fortune 500 CEOs weigh in on how they're thinking about eventually re-opening the economy and, if applicable, their businesses. Rite Aid CEO Heyward Donigan, whose business never closed, says we'll never "go back to the old normal." Duke Energy CEO Lynn Good advises leaders to remember which priorities to put first: customers and employees. And Gap Inc. CEO Sonia Syngal says that "last time [she] checked, people still put on clothes every morning." Fortune

MOVERS AND SHAKERS: Rebecca Campbell, most recently president of Disneyland Resort, is the new chairman of Disney's direct-to-consumer and international divisions following the departure of Kevin Mayer, Disney's streaming chief who will be TikTok's new CEO. Google Cloud hired SAP Industries president Lori Mitchell-Keller as VP of industry solutions. 

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT

- Warning sign. Five companies, mostly in mining and manufacturing, received a stern warning from the U.K. Investment Association over the lack of women in their senior roles. The "red-top alerts" are actually seen as a good sign: that shareholders, emerging from the crisis concerns of the pandemic, aren't likely to let issues like gender diversity slide during the economic downturn. Financial Times

- Consumer reports. Democratic lawmakers and consumer advocates are arguing that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, led by director Kathy Kraninger, has used the coronavirus pandemic to relax restrictions meant to protect consumers, under the guise of providing companies with flexibility through the crisis. Kraninger says the bureau is "first and foremost informing consumers ... and protecting them in the marketplace." Politico

- Leadership pays off. In New Zealand, we're seeing evidence that leadership skills are serving female leaders well not just in preventing the worst of the pandemic, but with voters. Three months ago, Jacinda Ardern's Labour party was neck-and-neck with its rival National party; today Ardern has a 59.5% personal support rate, compared to 4.5% for National leader Simon Bridges. Bloomberg

ON MY RADAR

There are real reasons you're playing pandemic pioneer woman Bustle

J.K. Rowling was drinking old-fashioneds and asked Twitter to explain Bitcoin. Here’s what happened next Fortune

Yes, those were sex dolls cheering on a South Korean soccer team New York Times

PARTING WORDS

"We chose this life. Everybody else has been forced into it. But I think you could turn that around and just embrace reality the way it is and not fight against it."

-Sister Judy Murray, a nun at the Carmelite Sisters of Baltimore, on being cloistered or quarantined