• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Politics

This Is What Biden Actually Said About Women in 1981 Op-Ed

By
Natasha Bach
Natasha Bach
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Natasha Bach
Natasha Bach
Down Arrow Button Icon
August 1, 2019, 11:16 AM ET

New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand went after former Vice President Joe Biden’s record on child care during Wednesday’s Democratic presidential debate, pointing to his vote against a child care tax credit while serving in the Senate in the 1980s.

Gillibrand noted that Biden was the sole vote against the bill and highlighted an op-ed Biden wrote at the time, claiming that “he believed that women outside the home would create the ‘deterioration’ of family. He also said that women who were working outside the home were avoiding ‘responsibility.’”

But what did Biden actually say?

.@JoeBiden op-ed in 1981: Expanding the childcare tax credit and allowing more women to work would subsidize "the deterioration of the family."

Those are his words. He should explain to America: How does a mom working lead to the deterioration of the family? pic.twitter.com/RADnzTbofx

— Meredith Kelly (@meredithk27) August 1, 2019

The 1981 op-ed, published in a local Massachusetts newspaper, was entitled “Congress is Subsidizing Deterioration of Family.” The quote to which Gillibrand was referring said, “A recent act of Congress puts the federal government in the position, through the tax codes, of subsidizing the deterioration of the family. That is tragic.”

What Gillibrand did not explain, however, is that Biden was not opposed to the tax credit outright: he was opposed to the fact that the bill would have made the credit available to anyone—regardless of income.

Later in the op-ed, he writes as much: “what I do not accept as legitimate is social policy that encourages a couple making $30,000 [the equivalent of close to $90,000 today], $40,000, $50,000 or more a year to evade full responsibility for their children by granting them a tax credit for day-care expenses.”

He continues that he does not believe it is “fair to ask a family of marginal income, choosing to provide the primary care for their children, to subsidize an upper income family’s day care.” In his view, such a subsidy would allow those with more means to work more and thereby earn more, allowing them to afford a “larger home, a patio, a swimming pool, or three weeks at the beach.”

“I do not believe the federal government should be party to a system which encourages couples to place their children in day-care centers in order to acquire material possessions that go far beyond any basic necessities,” he writes.

While he ultimately voted against the bill, Biden had tried (and failed) to add an amendment to it that would have eliminated the credit for wealthy couples, leaving an exception for single parents of all incomes.

During the debate on Wednesday, Biden echoed these points, noting that the tax credit “would have given people making today $100,000 a year a tax break for child care. I did not want that.”

Gillibrand doubled down, questioning whether Biden “no longer believes” that “women working outside the home would lead to the deterioration of family” to which Biden replied, “I never believed it.”

HuffPost, which highlighted Biden’s record on the subject in an article published last week, notes that since 1981 Biden has “supported the child credit and other expansions of tax credits for working people,” including getting key Republican support on bills related to child care while working in the Obama administration.

More must-read stories from Fortune:

—In a debate over differences, these are the topics not discussed on night one

—Democrats spar over health care, race, and gun violence in high-energy debate

—4 things we learned from night one of the second Democratic debate

—Highlights from the first night of the second Democratic debate

—Detroit happily steps into role of political HQ as Democrats gather for debate

—Abortion, reparations, Israel: Topics to watch during second Democratic debate


About the Author
By Natasha Bach
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Politics

President Donald Trump attends a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington, DC on December 2, 2025.
Economynational debt
Two months into the new fiscal year and the U.S. government is already spending more than $10 billion a week servicing national debt
By Eleanor PringleDecember 4, 2025
1 minute ago
Isaacman
PoliticsNASA
Billionaire spacewalker pleads his case to lead NASA, again, in Senate hearing
By Marcia Dunn and The Associated PressDecember 3, 2025
17 hours ago
Hegseth
PoliticsWhite House
As Democrats cry ‘war crimes,’ Hegseth claims ‘fog of war’ over Latin America boat strikes
By Stephen Groves, Nick Lichtenberg, Lisa Mascaro and The Associated PressDecember 3, 2025
17 hours ago
Trump
PoliticsWhite House
Trump insists ‘Trump is sharp’ despite cabinet meeting appearing to show him struggling to stay awake
By Will Weissert, Michelle L. Price and The Associated PressDecember 3, 2025
17 hours ago
Bessent
BankingFederal Reserve
‘We’re going to veto them’: Bessent backs new rules to give White House more power over Federal Reserve
By Christopher Rugaber and The Associated PressDecember 3, 2025
17 hours ago
Bessent
Economyphilanthropy
Scott Bessent calls the Giving Pledge well-intentioned but ‘very amorphous,’ growing from ‘a panic among the billionaire class’
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 3, 2025
18 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
North America
Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos commit $102.5 million to organizations combating homelessness across the U.S.: ‘This is just the beginning’
By Sydney LakeDecember 2, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Ford workers told their CEO 'none of the young people want to work here.' So Jim Farley took a page out of the founder's playbook
By Sasha RogelbergNovember 28, 2025
6 days ago
placeholder alt text
North America
Anonymous $50 million donation helps cover the next 50 years of tuition for medical lab science students at University of Washington
By The Associated PressDecember 2, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
C-Suite
MacKenzie Scott's $19 billion donations have turned philanthropy on its head—why her style of giving actually works
By Sydney LakeDecember 2, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Innovation
Google CEO Sundar Pichai says we’re just a decade away from a new normal of extraterrestrial data centers
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 1, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Scott Bessent calls the Giving Pledge well-intentioned but ‘very amorphous,’ growing from ‘a panic among the billionaire class’
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 3, 2025
18 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.