• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Elon Musk Tells Federal Judge He Didn’t Violate SEC Agreement With Tesla Tweet

By
Don Reisinger
Don Reisinger
By
Don Reisinger
Don Reisinger
March 12, 2019, 8:39 AM ET

Elon Musk is defiant in the face of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) allegations that he violated an agreement he signed with the agency last year.

In a court filing on Monday, Musk said that a tweet in February discussing how many cars Tesla will ship this year failed to violate his SEC agreement because, in part, it was “immaterial” to his company’s performance. Musk’s attorneys said in the filing, which was earlier reported by The Wall Street Journal, that the tweet “was simply Musk’s shorthand gloss on and entirely consistent with prior public disclosures detailing Tesla’s anticipated production volume.” The attorneys called it “celebratory and forward-looking.”

The kerfuffle started in February, when Musk wrote that in 2011, Tesla hadn’t produced any cars. But by the end of 2019, Musk said, Tesla would produce 500,000 vehicles. A few hours later, he worked with a Tesla attorney to revise the earlier tweet and say that the 500,000-unit figure was an “annualized production rate” that meant Tesla is now producing 10,000 cars per week. The company will likely end 2019 with 400,000 vehicles produced in the calendar year.

Soon after, the SEC filed a contempt complaint against Musk, alleging that he violated an agreement the parties signed last year requiring him to get approval on any tweets he might send that are material to Tesla. That agreement, which came after Musk said he was considering taking Tesla private, also included a requirement that he no longer serve as Tesla’s board chairman.

Since that agreement, Musk has been critical of the SEC and taken shots at the agency. In the court filing, Musk’s attorneys argued that the contempt accusation might have been more about those barbs and hurt feelings than the offending tweet.

“Undeterred, and perhaps embarrassed by Musk’s criticism of it, the SEC urges the court to read and apply the order in an unconstitutional manner,” his attorneys wrote.

Neither the SEC nor Tesla immediately responded to a Fortune request for comment on the latest filing.

About the Author
By Don Reisinger
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.