• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
intellectual property

Burberry Accuses J.C. Penney of Ripping Off its Check Pattern

Phil Wahba
By
Phil Wahba
Phil Wahba
Senior Writer
Down Arrow Button Icon
Phil Wahba
By
Phil Wahba
Phil Wahba
Senior Writer
Down Arrow Button Icon
February 9, 2016, 4:13 PM ET
Kate Moss Modelling Contracts At Risk
LONDON - SEPTEMBER 23: An advertisement for Burberry featuring the face of the campaign Kate Moss is displayed in Knightsbridge on September 19, 2005 in London, England. Moss's modelling contracts are under threat following revelations of her drug taking and troubled private life with her reportedly now ex-boyfriend Pete Doherty. (Photo by Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images)Gareth Cattermole/Getty Images

British high end fashion brand Burberry (BURBY) is suing J.C. Penney (JCP), accusing the mid-tier department store of infringing on its signature “Burberry check” pattern.

Burberry claimed in a suit filed in U.S. District Court in Manhattan on Tuesday afternoon that it has suffered “substantial and irreparable injury.” The British fashion house said Penney had been illegally selling “quilted jackets” with the pattern, as well as “scarf coats” in which scarves with the pattern were sold with matching coats. Burberry claimed that Penney kept selling the items in question for two months after learning of its objections.

A J.C. Penney spokeswoman declined to comment, citing company policy on pending litigation.

Taking a dig at Penney, which caters to more frugal customers, Burberry said in the court filing that “even though defendants’ infringing products are of inferior quality, they appear superficially similar to genuine Burberry products.” It then said Penney had intended to “deceive and mislead consumers into believing that defendants’ or their products are authorized, sponsored by or connected to Burberry.” The London-based company said it has held the check trademark since the 1920s.

The lawsuit seeks a halt to further infringements, as well as either triple damages, the disgorgement of illegal profits, or up to $2 million for each infringed trademark, Reuters reported.

Penney gets about 51% of its sales from in-house brands of clothes and home goods.

About the Author
Phil Wahba
By Phil WahbaSenior Writer
LinkedIn iconTwitter icon

Phil Wahba is a senior writer at Fortune primarily focused on leadership coverage, with a prior focus on retail.

See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.