• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Real Estate

Port Authority Agrees to Subsidize Rupert Murdoch’s Rent

By
Claire Groden
Claire Groden
By
Claire Groden
Claire Groden
December 11, 2015 at 7:07 PM UTC
US-ECONOMY-CONSTRUCTION-WTC
People walk past the construction site of the One World Trade Center in New York on October 17, 2014. US spending on construction slowed in August 2014, with declines in both the private and public sectors, the Commerce Department reported. Total construction spending fell 0.8 percent from July to an annual rate of $961.0 billion, but year-over-year was up 5.0 percent. The July figure was revised sharply lower to $968.8 billion from the prior estimate of $981.0 billion. AFP PHOTO/Jewel Samad (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)Photograph by Jewel Samad—AFP/Getty Images

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey voted on Thursday to offer Rupert Murdoch’s companies 21st Century Fox (FOX) and New Corp. (NWSA) subsidized rent in the not-yet-built 2 World Trade Center office building.

With the subsidy, which Port Authority estimates is worth $9 million, the public agency hopes to close the deal that would establish the name-brand companies as anchor tenants of the office building—kicking the building’s construction into high gear.

Port Authority’s executive director Patrick J. Foye told The New York Times that the deal could lead to more than $500 million in revenue for Port Authority, which needs the money for projects like a new Port Authority Bus Terminal in midtown Manhattan and trans-Hudson rail tunnel.

The subsidy raises concerns because Port Authority had previously promised not to spend public money on the World Trade Center project. But with so much revenue hinging on the construction of 2 World Trace Center—and that construction hinging on a big lease agreement—the Port Authority says it’s worth a broken promise.

Port Authority chairman John Degnan defended the subsidy in a press conference, according to Capital New York, saying, “It seems to me not much different than what the state of New Jersey does repeatedly and the state of New York does repeatedly, which is to [provide incentives to] companies to locate facilities within their jurisdiction, with all the benefits that that brings.”

The two Murdoch-owned companies have not yet agreed to the sweetened deal.

About the Author
By Claire Groden
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.