• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
TechNet neutrality

The government’s controversial Internet rules are already having an impact

Claire Zillman
By
Claire Zillman
Claire Zillman
Editor, Leadership
Down Arrow Button Icon
Claire Zillman
By
Claire Zillman
Claire Zillman
Editor, Leadership
Down Arrow Button Icon
June 18, 2015, 8:21 AM ET
Obama Outlines Policy For Open And Free Internet
NEW YORK, NY - NOVEMBER 10: Network cables are plugged in a server room on November 10, 2014 in New York City. U.S. President Barack Obama called on the Federal Communications Commission to implement a strict policy of net neutrality and to oppose content providers in restricting bandwith to customers. (Photo by Michael Bocchieri/Getty Images)Photograph by Michael Bocchieri — Getty Images

That sure was fast.

The government’s new net neutrality rules went into effect on Friday, and they’re already making a difference.

Sprint (S) had been combatting overloaded networks by slowing down data speeds for its the heaviest users of its wireless Internet service. The nation’s third-largest wireless carrier halted that practice on Friday due to the implementation of the new net neutrality requirements, which cover wireless networks for the first time. The regulations are part of the Federal Communications Commission’s rules approved in February that treat broadband Internet service more like a utility. Sprint told The Wall Street Journal that it thought its policy would have been permitted under the new rules, but dropped it out of precaution.

The company made that decision just before the FCC announced on Wednesday that it would fine AT&T Mobility $100 million for a related practice. The agency said the company mislead millions of its unlimited data customers by slowing down the services once users had reached a certain data threshold. AT&T (T) made the changes to customers’ services without adequately informing them. A company spokesman told The New York Times that it plans to “vigorously dispute” the regulatory agency’s accusations.

About the Author
Claire Zillman
By Claire ZillmanEditor, Leadership
LinkedIn iconTwitter icon

Claire Zillman is a senior editor at Fortune, overseeing leadership stories. 

See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.