• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Exclusive: CalPERS considers KKR account

By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
December 16, 2011, 2:46 PM ET

The nation’s largest pension system considers a new type of alternative investment commitment.

I’ve been giving thought to 2012 storylines in private equity. One of them certainly will be the rise of large custom managed accounts, of the type recently agreed upon by the New Jersey Division of Investment with The Blackstone Group (BX) and the Texas Teachers’ Retirement System with Apollo Global Management (APO) and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (BX).

For big public pensions, it’s a chance to put billions of dollars to work in one fell swoop, diversify their alternative investment exposure and receive deeper market insights from asset managers who now arguably view the pension more as a real partner than just another investor. For the PE firms, particularly publicly-listed ones, it’s a great way to increase long-term assets under management and make future fundraising a bit easier (albeit at the expense of premium fees).

So it shouldn’t be surprising to learn that the country’s largest public pension system, CalPERS, is in talks with several large PE firms about forming custom managed accounts. The one name I’ve heard repeatedly has been KKR, although I wouldn’t be surprised if The Carlyle Group and Apollo also were in the mix (given that CalPERS owns minority ownership positions in each firm). No comment from CalPERS or KKR, natch.

If CalPERS does consummate one of these arrangements, I’d assume that it will be more forthcoming with specific details than has been Texas TRS – a system that says its arrangements will be “ILPA-compliant” but refuses to explain exactly what that means (let alone disclose fee arrangements). Texas TRS also will not disclose the other PE firms on which it conducted due diligence, denying system beneficiaries of context in judging the TRS selections (word is that certain PE firms balked at the terms offered by TRS, but we still don’t know who).

These accounts may make a whole lot of sense, but I’m hoping that they don’t become some sort of fund-of-funds shield for adequate public transparency…


Sign up for my daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com

About the Author
By Dan Primack
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.