• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Bidding companies open up about wireless auction

Michal Lev-Ram
By
Michal Lev-Ram
Michal Lev-Ram
Special Correspondent
Down Arrow Button Icon
Michal Lev-Ram
By
Michal Lev-Ram
Michal Lev-Ram
Special Correspondent
Down Arrow Button Icon
November 30, 2011, 2:13 PM ET

By Michal Lev-Ram

Now that the Federal Communication Commission’s spectrum auction has been officially over for more than ten days, participating companies are finally opening up about the bidding process and their perspective mobile strategies for the new airwaves they won (or, in Google’s case, didn’t win). During the auction — in which carriers, chip makers and Internet players battled it out for 700MHz spectrum licenses over the course of eight weeks — participating bidders weren’t allowed to tk due to

Google may be walking away from the government’s recently-closed spectrum auction empty-handed, but that doesn’t mean the Mountain View, Calif.-based search giant hasn’t won anything.

Sure, Verizon Wireless (VZ) snagged the most licenses in the 700MHz auction, which ended last week. But, while the mobile operator will have to shell out over $9 billion for its new airwaves, Google (GOOG) got what it wanted without paying a cent.

How so? By lobbying the Federal Communications Commission to make the soon-to-be-available airwaves open to all devices and applications, and bidding just enough to make sure the reserve price — and the new conditions — were met.

“Google just went in to get the networks opened up,” ABI Research analyst Nadine Manjaro said in a report. “They did achieve their goal of requiring that the networks be open to whatever devices they intend to bring to market, without incurring major costs. The rules of the C block [one of five portions of spectrum that were up for auction] requires the spectrum to be open to any device and any application.”

Last year Google led a handful of companies in lobbying the FCC to “open up” the upcoming airwaves, meaning that at least a portion of the soon-to-be available spectrum allow equal access to all cell phones and mobile applications, regardless of who wins the auction. Google even went as far as pledging their intent to put up the $4.6 billion minimum bid price if the FCC agrees to adopt its rules.

But analysts say it’s likely Google never wanted to own wireless airwaves in the first place, it just wanted to make sure its conditions would be met. And that’s exactly what it got.

Google’s mobile strategy is contingent on getting its mobile applications (such as e-mail, maps and search) into as many users’ hands as possible. But with carriers’ current tight grip on the type of phones and applications that can run on their networks, that hasn’t always been an easy goal to achieve. That’s why the new conditions Google lobbied for – and Verizon must now adhere to – will likely make it easier for the company to spread its mobile services far and wide. It could also make it easier for Google to get future Android phones, which are upcoming devices that run on the company’s mobile operating system, to work on the new network.

Google declined to comment, citing FCC “anti-collusion” rules barring all bidders from disclosing details until 10 days after the auction’s close. But the company praised the results of the auction as a “major victory for American consumers” in a blog post published late Thursday.

“We congratulate the winners and look forward to a more open wireless world,” the company said on its public policy blog. “As a result of the auction, consumers whose devices use the C-block of spectrum soon will be able to use any wireless device they wish, and download to their devices any applications and content they wish.”

Of course, just because consumers will someday soon be able to have more say in the type of applications or phones they wish to use doesn’t mean they will opt for the ones made by Google. When it comes to the still-nascent world of mobile offerings, the company is facing plenty of competition from other players, among them Yahoo (YHOO), Microsoft (MSFT) and plenty of startups.

About the Author
Michal Lev-Ram
By Michal Lev-RamSpecial Correspondent
Twitter icon

Michal Lev-Ram is a special correspondent covering the technology and entertainment sectors for Fortune, writing analysis and longform reporting.

See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

CryptoBinance
Binance has been proudly nomadic for years. A new announcement suggests it’s finally chosen a headquarters
By Ben WeissDecember 7, 2025
3 hours ago
Big TechStreaming
Trump warns Netflix-Warner deal may pose antitrust ‘problem’
By Hadriana Lowenkron, Se Young Lee and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
Big TechOpenAI
OpenAI goes from stock market savior to burden as AI risks mount
By Ryan Vlastelica and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
InvestingStock
What bubble? Asset managers in risk-on mode stick with stocks
By Julien Ponthus, Natalia Kniazhevich, Abhishek Vishnoi and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
Macron warns EU may hit China with tariffs over trade surplus
By James Regan and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
7 hours ago
EconomyTariffs and trade
U.S. trade chief says China has complied with terms of trade deals
By Hadriana Lowenkron and BloombergDecember 7, 2025
8 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
15 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.