• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

The real problem with Romney’s ‘people’ comment

By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
Down Arrow Button Icon
August 12, 2011, 7:20 PM ET

“Corporations are people, my friend.”



That’s what presidential candidate Mitt Romney yesterday told an attendee at the Iowa State Fair, in response to a question about why Romney’s deficit reduction focus seems to be more on federal entitlement reform than corporate tax reform. Not surprisingly, the onetime private equity executive is getting hammered for it.

For example, John Huntsman spokesman Tim Miller tweeted: “Was American Pad & Paper Company a person/friend?” Venture capitalist Chris Dixon was even harsher: “If corporations are people, then Mitt Romney made his fortune buying and selling people.”

What’s too bad about all this piling on is that it misses the economic policy point Romney was trying to make. Here is the rest of his comment, which hasn’t gotten much attention:

“Everything corporations earn ultimately goes to the people. Where do you think it goes? Whose pockets? Whose pockets? People’s pockets. Human beings my friend.”

Romney doesn’t think corporations are actual people, even though some supporters of the Citizens United decision might disagree. He thinks that corporations help actual people, by creating wealth. Companies make money, which they then distribute to employees, shareholders, etc. You know, capitalism.

The problem with Romney’s claim, however, is that far too many American corporations are not redistributing their wealth. Instead, they’re hoarding it.

Non-financial companies were sitting on more than $1.9 trillion in cash and other liquid assets as of March 31, 2011, according to the Federal Reserve’s most recent “Flow of Funds” report. That’s an all-time high, and means that unemployment is being driven by Corporate America’s unwillingness to hire — not because it doesn’t have the money to do so. Were it to be a person, the best embodiment might be Uncle Scrooge.

And please spare me the “uncertainty” argument. So long as we elect new federal representatives every two years, there will never be any certainty over future tax policy, regulatory policy, healthcare policy, etc. Let alone macro-economic conditions that always are on the move. Any company waiting for “certainty” before hiring might as well shut down its recruitment department.

Romney’s mistake isn’t in thinking that companies are humans. It’s in overestimating their humanity.

About the Author
By Dan Primack
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.