• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Trendingnow

1

As U.S. Treasury intervened in the bond market, the Netherlands rushed 86 tons of gold out of America because of ‘geopolitical unrest’

2

'Critical employees will begin to retire': Trump’s new pay plan will deny most federal roles a raise, and it has workers warning of a retention crunch

3

One of MacKenzie Scott's latest donations takes her HBCU giving to well over $1 billion

1

As U.S. Treasury intervened in the bond market, the Netherlands rushed 86 tons of gold out of America because of ‘geopolitical unrest’

2

'Critical employees will begin to retire': Trump’s new pay plan will deny most federal roles a raise, and it has workers warning of a retention crunch

3

One of MacKenzie Scott's latest donations takes her HBCU giving to well over $1 billion

Apple’s blow-out quarter: The bloggers called it. The Street blew it.

By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
April 20, 2010, 7:13 PM ET
Google source logo
Add Fortune on Google for similar content.

Once again, the armchair analysts humiliate Wall Street’s professionals



There’s almost nothing good to say about the estimates published by professional analysts in advance of Apple’s (AAPL) second quarter earnings. Not only did the pros badly underestimate almost every aspect of the company’s business — from revenue and earnings to unit sales — but they were bested in every category by a rag-tag group of bloggers, day traders and armchair analysts.

The chart posted below the fold says it all. The bright greens (indicating best estimates) are all in the top portion of the chart, where the estimates of the so-called unaffiliated analysts were recorded.

The bright reds (indicating worst estimates) all went to the pros. A few of the professionals scored some light greens, indicating second- or third-best guess. But all the pinks (second- or third-worst) fell in their portion of the chart.

Without further delay, the dismal results:



Green: best. Red: worst. Light green: 2nd or 3rd best. Pink: 2nd or 3rd worst.

To be fair, in most categories, Apple blew past even the bloggers’ best estimates. See here. Basically, the amateurs won the smackdown by being more bullish than Wall Street’s most bullish analysts.

Still, some of their estimates were remarkably prescient.

Special mention goes, once more, to Turley Muller, who writes an occasional blog called Financial Alchemist. Not only did he outperform the pack this quarter — scoring four greens and a light green — but this is the sixth straight quarter in a row that he’s done it.

“I knew iPhones were going to be a blowout,” he wrote from a bar where he was celebrating the results. “I was just surprised at the magnitude.”

Three other unaffiliates scored solid greens: Robert Paul Leitao from The Mac Observer’s Apple Finance Board; Daniel Tello from Deagol’s AAPL Model (who also got three light greens) and Bullish Cross‘ Andy Zaky, who nailed the Mac number.

And who were the worst Apple analysts this quarter?

  • Morgan Stanley’s Katy Huberty with two reds and not a trace of green.
  • Citicorp’s Richard Gardner, with two reds and a pink, leavened only slightly by one light green
  • Morgan Keegan’s Travis McCourt, with a red on EPS and a pink on revenue.
  • Piper Jaffray’s Gene Munster and Merrill Lynch’s Scott Craig, with one solid red apiece.

In defense of the professionals, they are paid to cover a range of tech companies, not just Apple. The amateurs, as group, tend to be investor-enthusiasts who concentrate only on their favorite stock.

But still.

UPDATE: Daniel Tello has used our chart to rank the analysts by how far they were off, with Muller on top (5.9%) and Gardner on the bottom (14.3%). According to Tello’s calculations, the amateurs as a group were off by 7.7%; the pros were off by 11.6% — 51% worse. See here.

See also:

  • Apple blow-out: Profits jump 89.5%
  • Apple’s Q1 2010 earnings: The Street’s big miss
  • Apple earnings: How the analysts got it so wrong
  • Apple’s 2009 Q3: Analyzing the analysts
  • Apple’s 2009 Q2: Analyzing the analysts
  • Apple’s 2009 Q1: Analyzing the analysts
  • Apple’s 2008 Q4: Analyzing the analysts

[Follow Philip Elmer-DeWitt on Twitter @philiped]

About the Author
By Philip Elmer-DeWitt
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Google source logo
Add Fortune on Google for similar content.

Latest in


Most Popular

Fortune Secondary Logo
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • World's Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
  • Lists Calendar
Sections
  • Finance
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Features
  • Leadership
  • Health
  • Commentary
  • Success
  • Retail
  • Mpw
  • Tech
  • Lifestyle
  • CEO Initiative
  • Asia
  • Politics
  • Conferences
  • Europe
  • Newsletters
  • Personal Finance
  • Environment
  • Magazine
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
  • Group Subscriptions
About Us
  • About Us
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • About Us
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map
  • Facebook icon
  • Twitter icon
  • LinkedIn icon
  • Instagram icon
  • TikTok icon
  • YouTube icon

    Latest in


    Most Popular

    © 2026 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
    FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.