• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

3-D report from CES

By
Stanley Bing
Stanley Bing
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Stanley Bing
Stanley Bing
Down Arrow Button Icon
January 8, 2010, 10:34 AM ET



Eighty percent of the stuff on the massive succession of floors here has something to do with thumping sound. Chairs are here that thump while you play immersive video games. Enormous speaker towers that you can pop your teeny iPod onto. Fabulous vehicles tricked out with woofers bigger than a Great Dane’s. Miniscule earbuds that fry your eustachian tubes. My conceptual issue here is that, I don’t know, I have a few sets of headphones and a couple of speakers here and there for a variety of purposes. How much sound gear does a person need? And why does it have to be thumping? I mean, some things should thump. But not everything.

There is still no food at CES. Or rather, the food stalls are few and the distance between them is vast. The lines are long. I think the most successful attraction at the show was the Starbucks. After that, Nathan’s. We walked around hungry most of the time, because really, who has time to wait half an hour for a hot dog or a cruller?

Beyond that, there are of course a billion cameras and digital guitars and automated environmental systems for your home and all kinds of crazy stuff, some of which actually looks keen and even addresses some consumer need. But in the end, this week, it’s all about 3-D TV. Sony and LG and Samsung and Panasonic and Nvidia and dozens of others were here dispensing gray glasses and then blasting your face with juicy imagery. My favorite screens, though, were the 2-D HD TVs that were less than an inch thick. I wanted one of those. They wouldn’t tell me how much it cost because they’re not priced yet, but when the technology comes down to under $1,000, I guess I’ll grab one. They’re all being manufactured to be 3-D capable, though. Right now, there isn’t much stuff to put on a 3-D TV, but that’s not stopping them. The industry is determined to give it to you, whether you recognize the fact that you want it or not.

I want to ask you something. Do you want 3-D? Beyond going to a movie theater and immersing yourself in it, do you like the experience? Does it give you a little bit of  a headache now and then? Do you like putting on glasses to watch TV in your living room, bedroom or rumpus room? If you had access to 3-D programming, what kind of programming would it be? Sports? News? Sex? What would drive you to watch a 3-D program?

I don’t really believe the electronics industry is asking these questions. They’re moving ahead full steam because in the past, technology has eventually triumphed over inertia, and they want everybody to acquire new hardware that’s even newer than the new hardware they just purchased. And they’ll probably win, too. Or at least some of them will. Me, I’d just like to know ahead of time who those winners might be, so I can avoid investing in the losers like I usually do.

About the Author
By Stanley Bing
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
0

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Real Estate
The 'Great Housing Reset' is coming: Income growth will outpace home-price growth in 2026, Redfin forecasts
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
AI
Nvidia CEO says data centers take about 3 years to construct in the U.S., while in China 'they can build a hospital in a weekend'
By Nino PaoliDecember 6, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The most likely solution to the U.S. debt crisis is severe austerity triggered by a fiscal calamity, former White House economic adviser says
By Jason MaDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon says Europe has a 'real problem’
By Katherine Chiglinsky and BloombergDecember 6, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Big Tech
Mark Zuckerberg rebranded Facebook for the metaverse. Four years and $70 billion in losses later, he’s moving on
By Eva RoytburgDecember 5, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Politics
Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old unanimous ruling that limits presidential power on removing heads of independent agencies
By Mark Sherman and The Associated PressDecember 7, 2025
16 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.