• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Apple’s security bug: Five NSA conspiracy theories

By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
February 23, 2014, 2:14 PM ET

SOUCE: NSA via Edward Snowden

FORTUNE — You don’t have to put on a tin hat to find the timing of the “Apple” entry in the attached Powerpoint slide suspicious, although a tin hat probably helps.

The slide, marked TOP SECRET, was one of the first documents leaked to The Guardian and the Washington Post by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden last June. It lays out the timeline for when the U.S. government’s top cyberspies gained access to user data on the servers of the major U.S. Internet companies: Microsoft (MSFT) in 2007, Google (GOOG) in 2009, AOL (AOL) in 2011 and Apple (AAPL) in Oct. 2012.

What makes that last entry so intriguing to conspiracy theorists is what computer experts discovered over the weekend about the security hole Apple patched — at least in part — on Friday. By comparing the original code to Apple’s fix, Adam Langley, a web encryption expert at Google, was able to pinpoint the problem.

The culprit, if you care about such things, was a short line of code — a “goto fail” without a corresponding “if” clause (see below) — in the software Apple uses to make sure a computer you are connecting to securely over the Internet is the computer it claims to be. This is critical when the website belongs to, say, a bank.

“It’s as bad as you could imagine, that’s all I can say,” Johns Hopkins University cryptography professor Matthew Green told Reuters. 

[Readers who know more about this subject than I disagree. “It takes an elaborate hoax to exploit,” henry3dogg wrote in the comment stream to an earlier version of the story. “Nobody is going to benefit from it accidentally. And it is unlikely that anyone would set up such an elaborate hoax, unless they knew that the loop hole existed.”]

Anyway, here’s where the timing gets interesting. According to Jeffrey Grossman, whose Confide iPhone app depended on Apple’s security protocols to deliver “off the record conversations,” the bug appeared in iOS 6.0 and was not present in iOS 5.11.

iOS 6.0 was released in September 2012, just before the NSA penetrated Apple’s servers .

To summarize:

  • Sept. 24, 2012: iOS 6.0 is released
  • Oct. 2012: Apple is added to the NSA’s list of penetrated servers
  • Dec. 1, 2012 to May 31, 2013: Apple receives 4,000 to 5,000 requests about 9,000 to 10,000 accounts and devices. (Per “Apple’s Commitment to Customer Privacy“.)

The evidence is purely circumstantial, but as Daring Fireball‘s John Gruber notes, “the shoe fits.” He goes on to connect the dots and offer “five levels of paranoia”:

1. Nothing. The NSA was not aware of this vulnerability.
2. The NSA knew about it, but never exploited it.
3. The NSA knew about it, and exploited it.
4. NSA itself planted it surreptitiously.
5. Apple, complicit with the NSA, added it.

Apple has explicitly denied No. 5. Gruber leans to No. 3, which leaves open the possibility that there are other, still undiscovered security holes through which user data is being funneled to the NSA.

The patch Apple released on Friday closed the “goto fail” hole for iPhones, iPads and iPod Touches. It remains open on the current version of OS X for the Mac.

“We are aware of this issue,” an Apple spokesperson told Reuters on Saturday, “and already have a software fix that will be released very soon.”

Below: The bug. (Can you spot the extra “goto fail”?)

LINKS:

  • A good write-up for security professionals: ThreatPost‘s Dennis Fisher
  • Analysis of the press coverage: AppleInsider’s Daniel Eran Dilger
About the Author
By Philip Elmer-DeWitt
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in

AIMeta
It’s ‘kind of jarring’: AI labs like Meta, Deepseek, and Xai earned some of the worst grades possible on an existential safety index
By Patrick Kulp and Tech BrewDecember 5, 2025
11 hours ago
RetailConsumer Spending
U.S. consumers are so financially strained they put more than $1 billion on buy-now, pay later services during Black Friday and Cyber Monday
By Jeena Sharma and Retail BrewDecember 5, 2025
12 hours ago
Elon Musk
Big TechSpaceX
Musk’s SpaceX discusses record valuation, IPO as soon as 2026
By Edward Ludlow, Loren Grush, Lizette Chapman, Eric Johnson and BloombergDecember 5, 2025
12 hours ago
data center
EnvironmentData centers
The rise of AI reasoning models comes with a big energy tradeoff
By Rachel Metz, Dina Bass and BloombergDecember 5, 2025
12 hours ago
netflix
Arts & EntertainmentAntitrust
Hollywood writers say Warner takeover ‘must be blocked’
By Thomas Buckley and BloombergDecember 5, 2025
12 hours ago
Personal FinanceLoans
5 ways to use a home equity line of credit (HELOC)
By Joseph HostetlerDecember 5, 2025
12 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Two months into the new fiscal year and the U.S. government is already spending more than $10 billion a week servicing national debt
By Eleanor PringleDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
‘Godfather of AI’ says Bill Gates and Elon Musk are right about the future of work—but he predicts mass unemployment is on its way
By Preston ForeDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nearly 4 million new manufacturing jobs are coming to America as boomers retire—but it's the one trade job Gen Z doesn't want
By Emma BurleighDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang admits he works 7 days a week, including holidays, in a constant 'state of anxiety' out of fear of going bankrupt
By Jessica CoacciDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Real Estate
‘There is no Mamdani effect’: Manhattan luxury home sales surge after mayoral election, undercutting predictions of doom and escape to Florida
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs and the $38 trillion national debt: Kevin Hassett sees ’big reductions’ in deficit while Scott Bessent sees a ‘shrinking ice cube’
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 4, 2025
2 days ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.