Social Security operates primarily as a pay-as-you-go program. Payroll taxes collected from current workers, along with taxes on benefits and other income, are used to pay benefits to current recipients. In 1983, bipartisan reforms signed into law by President Ronald Reagan were designed to strengthen the program for decades. Those changes created reserves in the Social Security trust funds, which have helped make up the difference since payroll taxes alone stopped covering full program costs around 2010.

Those reserves are now projected to be depleted by early 2032, if no legislative changes are made. Under current law, Social Security would then only be able to pay benefits from incoming revenue, triggering across-the-board reductions. Estimates vary somewhat depending on the assumptions used, but projected reductions generally range from about 23% to 28%. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the cut could begin at about 7% in 2032 and deepen to an average of roughly 28% annually from 2033 through 2036.

Impacts on Beneficiaries

A reduction of this size would have an immediate and painful effect on retiree households. Using current 2026 benefit levels, a 28% cut would reduce the average retired worker’s monthly benefit from about $2,071 to $1,491, a loss of roughly $6,960 per year. An average retired couple receiving $3,208 per month would see that amount fall to about $2,310, losing more than $10,700 annually. Those with higher benefits would face proportionally larger dollar losses.

For many Americans, Social Security is not just supplemental income – it is their primary source. A cut of nearly one-third would force many households to make difficult decisions about housing, food, transportation, and medical care. The effect would be especially severe for older retirees, widows, lower-income households, and those with little or no savings.

Poverty among older Americans would almost certainly rise. Benefit cuts of this magnitude could increase the number of beneficiaries living in poverty by more than 50%, with more than 16 million Americans over age 65 potentially falling below the poverty line. That would represent a dramatic reversal in one of Social Security’s most important achievements: dramatically reducing elderly poverty.

Healthcare would also become a greater concern. Social Security’s financing problems do not directly reduce Medicare Part A hospital payments because the two programs are funded through separate trust funds. However, both are pressured by similar forces, including population aging and rising costs. If Social Security benefits are reduced while Medicare Part A also faces financial strain, retirees could experience the double burden of lower income and tighter healthcare access. For people already living on fixed incomes, that combination could be especially destabilizing.

Impacts on the U.S. Economy

The effects would not stop with retirees. Social Security benefits are spent quickly and locally, supporting household consumption and economic activity in communities across the country. A broad benefit cut would remove a substantial amount of purchasing power from the economy almost immediately.

The projected economic consequences are serious. A 28% cut beginning in 2032 could reduce real U.S. GDP by about 0.7% soon after trust fund depletion[1] — a meaningful drag concentrated in the near term.

The ripple effects could include slower business activity, fewer jobs supported by consumer demand, and reduced labor income tied to those jobs. Lower spending could also dampen inflation, prompting the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates in an effort to support growth.

Some workers may choose to delay retirement or re-enter the workforce to offset benefit losses, which could eventually add some economic output back into the system. But that adjustment would not eliminate the near-term shock caused by a sudden drop in spending among older households.

The Outlook

Warnings about Social Security’s funding shortfall are not new. Analysts have been projecting trust fund depletion for over a decade. What has changed is the timeline. The window for Congressional action is shrinking, and the closer the nation gets to the projected depletion date, the more difficult it may become to implement gradual, less disruptive solutions.

Still, this would not be the first time Congress has addressed a serious Social Security financing challenge. In the early 1980s, the program faced a similar crisis. The bipartisan National Commission studied the problem and recommended reforms that were ultimately enacted in 1983. Those changes restored stability and extended solvency for decades.

That history matters. It reminds us that Social Security’s challenges are serious, but not unsolvable. The real risk is not that solutions do not exist — the risk is delay. If nothing is done, the law requires benefits to be limited to available revenue, and the resulting reductions would affect retirees, families, and the broader economy all at once. The sooner policymakers act, the more options they will have to protect beneficiaries and strengthen the program for future generations.

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.