As we kick off 2026, activist investor campaigns are no longer just prevalent; they are global, sophisticated, and have increasingly become an acute threat to corporate leadership.
The escalating pressure is undeniable: Barclays data shows that activist investor campaigns hit a high last year – surpassing 2024 by 5% – with 32 CEOs resigning as a result (a record) – and showing no signs of slowing down. The number of public campaigns continues to grow significantly, with Goldman Sachs’s 2026 Outlook anticipating a new five-year high by the end of 2026.
And this doesn’t include the private campaigns – born in the Board room, remaining there, and rapidly leading to changes at the board and management level. These campaigns are also getting broader, according to Conference Board research, which points to a sustained expansion beyond traditional value-driven targets and increasingly centered around topical social issues like diversity, climate and beyond.
Activism thrives on corporate uncertainty and increasingly leverages a fast-changing media environment to exert pressure. According to the Goldman Outlook, features of recent campaigns – from impatience with internal “self-help” plans to intense scrutiny of capital allocation – place leadership, including CEOs, CFOs and Boards, directly in the crosshairs.
It’s no longer a question of whether activism will strike. Instead, organizations must proactively build resilience, consider concrete steps that can fortify an organization against an attack, and consider how to protect reputation through the course of the attack.
There are important and practical steps companies – and especially CEOs – can take to ensure they are blunting the impact of activist efforts before they ever start. These include:
- Own performance and the path forward. Activists thrive on perceived underperformance or opaque reporting, both of which create the kind of uncertainty they seek. CEOs and CFOs who consistently demonstrate a deep command of the business and its outcomes remove a primary wedge for activist intervention. Proactive, clear and consistent communication around performance – both good and bad, and not just around earnings calls – builds trust with investors and significantly weakens the activist narrative. This can take the form of softer broadcast interviews, owned LinkedIn video updates and/or employee emails (which quickly become external), all of which help executives own the message.
- Articulate a clear strategic vision, celebrate milestones and communicate progress. A vacuum in strategic direction is an open invitation for activists to propose their own. CEOs must articulate a coherent, long-term strategic plan, complete with measurable milestones, clear goals, and a compelling narrative of how these will drive sustained shareholder value. Make it the central pillar of all external and internal communications.
Regular updates on progress against these milestones – such as celebrating interim successes and openly addressing challenges – demonstrate leadership, foresight, and control. This approach also preempts activist claims of stagnation, proving that the company is actively charting its own course.
- Be visible and authentically engaged. In an environment where activists leverage every platform to build their case, the CEO’s visibility becomes a critical asset. This means active and strategic engagement with key stakeholders:
- Investors: Build relationships and two-way communication before a crisis hits. Engage in regular, proactive dialogues with institutional investors, demonstrating accessibility and a willingness to listen.
This isn’t merely about transparency; it’s about leveraging engagement as an executive’s first line of defense to anticipate and neutralize activist plays by understanding their pressure points and rallying the shareholder base as a barrier. This approach could transform potential adversaries into advocates, giving leadership an upper hand when activist pressure mounts.
- Stakeholders, not just shareholders: Reputation extends beyond shareholders and into an organization’s broader stakeholder universe (in fact, there’s a $7T “reputation economy”). Strategic engagement with customers, employees and community leaders reinforces the company’s purpose and impact, adding layers of defense against single-issue or ESG-focused campaigns.
- Media: Sometimes the perception battle that plays out via media is months in the making – on both activist and corporate sides – and the winner is the best prepared.
Be a consistent and thoughtful voice to tell the company’s story, articulate its vision and highlight its achievements, and not only in good times. Leadership-focused stories can humanize executives and illustrate that they work in service of the company, just like the rest of the workforce. Established, regular relationships with top-tier business journalists, as well as trade and market-focused reporters critical to the business, are indispensable when issues materialize.
Shaping the public narrative through proactive media engagement helps counter activist misrepresentations. Discernment is critical, however; an executive should not respond to every media question or do every interview, but address issues head on to take the air out of activist arguments.
The activist landscape will continue to evolve, demanding agility and foresight from corporate leadership.
By consistently owning performance, articulating a clear strategic vision, and maintaining authentic, consistent visibility, CEOs, CFOs and Boards can establish a formidable defense that strengthens their company’s resilience, safeguards their leadership narrative, and shapes their future in an increasingly scrutinized environment.
The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.
