• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
PoliticsRoe v. Wade

Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade in historic but anticipated reversal: ‘This is an invasion of a woman’s body’

By
Erin Prater
Erin Prater
and
Chris Morris
Chris Morris
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Erin Prater
Erin Prater
and
Chris Morris
Chris Morris
Down Arrow Button Icon
June 24, 2022, 10:12 AM ET
Two pro-choice demonstrators are surrounded by anti-abortion demonstrators outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 1, 2021, in Washington, D.C.
Two pro-choice demonstrators are surrounded by anti-abortion demonstrators outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Nov. 1, 2021, in Washington, D.C.Drew Angerer—Getty Images

The Supreme Court has voted to overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, a 1992 decision that upheld it, in a historic yet anticipated reversal.

The right to an abortion is now left to individual states.

“The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion … and the authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, released Friday.

“It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives.”

Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan filed a dissenting opinion “with sorrow—for this Court, but more, for the many millions of American women who have today lost a fundamental constitutional protection.”

“We dissent.”

The Friday decision “says that from the very moment of fertilization, a woman has no rights to speak of,” they wrote. “A state can force her to bring a pregnancy to term, even at the steepest personal and familial costs.”

President Joe Biden called Friday “a sad day for the court and the country,” the Associated Press reported.

“Now with Roe gone, let’s be very clear, the health and life of women across this nation are now at risk,” he said in an address from the White House. “The court has done what it’s never done before—expressly taking away a constitution right that is so fundamental to so many Americans.”

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said Friday that the Justice Department will “work tirelessly to protect and advance reproductive freedom.”

“We stand ready to work with other arms of the federal government that seek to use their lawful authorities to protect and preserve access to reproductive care,” he said.

Garland noted that the Food and Drug Administration has approved the use of mifepristone, a drug used to end pregnancies, and said states cannot ban the drug “based on disagreement with the FDA’s expert judgment about its safety and efficacy.”

Anita Hill—the chair of the Hollywood Commission, an organization that works to stop discrimination, harassment, and abuse in the entertainment industry, and a professor of social policy, law, and women’s studies at Brandeis University—said the decision will do “immeasurable harm now and into the future,” in a statement provided to Fortune.

Hill testified before Congress in 1991 about the sexual harassment she said she experienced while working as an aide to Clarence Thomas, a Supreme Court Justice who once supervised her at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The hardships caused by Friday’s decision “are likely to fall most heavily on pregnant individuals who are low income, people of color, and who live in rural communities,” she said.

Businesses can “show support for their workforce members by calling for legislation that supports reproductive liberty” and making sure that workers “have the resources and accommodations they need to continue doing their jobs,” she added.

Hundreds gathered outside the Supreme Court on Friday after the ruling was issued, some changing “legal abortion on demand” and “this decision must not stand,” the AP reported. Others shouted, “The Supreme Court is illegitimate.”

“Women will die,” Suzanna Sherry, a professor at Vanderbilt Law School, told Fortune on Friday when asked for her reaction to the ruling.

“Some women will die in childbirth. Some women will die trying to get illegal abortions. They will take medicines that are not safe. They will try to abort themselves. Some women will die at the hands of domestic partners when partners find out they’re pregnant. That’s the real consequence of their decision.”

Scott Skinner-Thompson, an associate professor at the University of Colorado Boulder’s law school, called the ruling “breathtaking.”

“It throws out almost a half century of approach to constitutional interpretation and basically says that if there was any practice of forbidding an activity at the time of ratification, that practice can be forbidden,” he said.

“What that means is basically, we’re stuck in time—dating back to the 18th century, dating back to the 19th century—people’s rights are not capable of moving forward from that.”

The ruling has devastating consequences “for people of marginalized communities, people of color, Black people, women—who were not recognized as full human beings under the original Constitution,” he added.

Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, called the ruling a “full employment opportunity for lawyers, on the legal side, and on the humanistic side, for women, a real travesty.”

The decision will lead to confusion and legal grey areas, he said, citing a situation where a woman lives in Texas but goes to visit her mother in Maryland, where she obtains and takes a so-called morning-after pill. The abortion doesn’t go as planned, however, and she finds herself in need of a dilation and curettage (D&C) procedure to remove the fetus when she returns back home to Texas.

“Can you get it done in Texas?” he asked. “What happens if you need an abortion for a miscarriage in process? Can they do that? At what point does does an OBGYN intervene? A fetus has a viable heartbeat but is going to be expelled. The woman’s bleeding out. How do you manage that medically? What do you do with an ectopic pregnancy, a pregnancy that’s not viable and a women’s life is at risk. Is that an exception?”

MORE: The best way to talk to employees about Roe v. Wade and not screw it up, according to a top CEO and communications adviser

The move to oveturn Roe was expected after bombshell reporting by Politico in May that revealed the court had already voted to overturn the decision, citing a leaked draft majority opinion by Alito that had circulated among members.

Jennifer Hendricks, a University of Colorado Law School professor, told Fortune in May that she was “shocked by the utter dismissiveness with which the court treats women’s bodies.”

“It was clear that this was coming,” she said of the overturn, calling it “the biggest non-scoop in history.”

“But it’s also so unprecedented for a draft to be leaked.”

Hendricks said the draft opinion contains a “remarkable level of contempt for women,” adding, “This is an invasion of a woman’s body to force her to carry a pregnancy to term.”

Josh Wilson, professor and chair of the political science department at the University of Denver in Colorado, told Fortune in May that conservative justices were “searching for a way to get at overturning Roe.”

“It’s really remarkable,” he said. “There’s been this discussion of, ‘We have this conservative supermajority. What will they do about abortion?’ It seemed like they would continue with some sort of chipping away at abortion access, versus going directly at it.”

On May 11 the Senate came up short in a rushed effort to enshrine the right to legal abortion into federal law. A 51-49 nearly party-line vote failed to end the Republicans’ filibuster blocking the proceeding. Sixty votes were needed to move ahead, The Associated Press reported.

Republicans “have chosen to stand in the way of Americans’ rights to make the most personal decisions about their own bodies, families, and lives,” Biden said in response to the vote, according to the AP, urging pro-choice voters to show up at polls in November and favor like-minded candidates.

As of early June, 26 states were “certain or likely” to ban abortion in the absence of Roe, according to the Guttmacher Institute, a research organization seeking to advance reproductive health rights. Thirteen of those states had “trigger laws” that would almost immediately halt legal abortions, and more than a quarter of abortion clinics in the U.S. could close as a result, according to a new study.

States with laws to restrict abortions in the absence of Roe as of June 1 include Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Ohio, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming, according to the Guttmacher Institute.

Sixteen states and D.C. had laws that protect the right to abortion—some prior to viability of the fetus and others throughout pregnancy, according to the institute. States with laws to protect abortions as of June 1 included California, Colorado, Connecticut, D.C., Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

About the Authors
By Erin Prater
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
By Chris MorrisFormer Contributing Writer

Chris Morris is a former contributing writer at Fortune, covering everything from general business news to the video game and theme park industries.

See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Politics

Letitia James
LawDepartment of Justice
Piling on Trump DOJ’s legitimacy issues, Letitia James challenges appointment of U.S. attorney suing her
By Michael Hill and The Associated PressDecember 4, 2025
13 hours ago
Scalise
PoliticsCongress
Congress flatlines in attempt to regulate college sports with bill ‘not ready for prime time’
By Joey Cappelletti and The Associated PressDecember 4, 2025
13 hours ago
Trump
PoliticsWhite House
‘We fixed inflation, and we fixed almost everything’: Trump travels to Pennsylvania to talk affordability while denying it’s a problem
By Josh Boak and The Associated PressDecember 4, 2025
13 hours ago
Brown
Politicsdiscrimination
Trump administration shows a pattern of firing Black leaders across government, former Transportation officials claim
By Josh Funk and The Associated PressDecember 4, 2025
13 hours ago
Erika Kirk
PoliticsMedia
Bari Weiss to moderate prime-time ‘town hall’ with Erika Kirk on CBS News
By The Associated PressDecember 4, 2025
13 hours ago
Zohran Mamdani, in front of a brick building, smiles as he holds a press conference.
Real EstateHousing
‘There is no Mamdani effect’: Manhattan luxury home sales surge after mayoral election, undercutting predictions of doom and escape to Florida
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 4, 2025
15 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Two months into the new fiscal year and the U.S. government is already spending more than $10 billion a week servicing national debt
By Eleanor PringleDecember 4, 2025
22 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
‘Godfather of AI’ says Bill Gates and Elon Musk are right about the future of work—but he predicts mass unemployment is on its way
By Preston ForeDecember 4, 2025
18 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang admits he works 7 days a week, including holidays, in a constant 'state of anxiety' out of fear of going bankrupt
By Jessica CoacciDecember 4, 2025
17 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Nearly 4 million new manufacturing jobs are coming to America as boomers retire—but it's the one trade job Gen Z doesn't want
By Emma BurleighDecember 4, 2025
18 hours ago
placeholder alt text
North America
Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez Bezos commit $102.5 million to organizations combating homelessness across the U.S.: ‘This is just the beginning’
By Sydney LakeDecember 2, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Health
Bill Gates decries ‘significant reversal in child deaths’ as nearly 5 million kids will die before they turn 5 this year
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 4, 2025
1 day ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.