Janet L. Yellen

Ted Halstead

At the 2015 Paris Climate Conference, the United States committed to reduce its net greenhouse gas emissions by 26% to 28% below 2005 levels by 2025. Even though the Trump administration has announced its intention to withdraw from the Paris agreement, it remains the benchmark by which any U.S. climate plan is judged.<div class="paywall-selector"></div><div class="paywall">
But it is only a starting point. Even if all nations meet their Paris commitments, the best studies indicate that far greater emissions reductions will be necessary for the world to maintain global temperatures below the agreed-upon 2 degrees Celsius threshold. The goal of U.S. climate policy should therefore be to exceed Paris.
We believe the most politically viable way to accomplish this is a plan co-authored by former Republican Secretaries of State James Baker and George Shultz. The Baker-Shultz plan is based on a gradually rising fee applied to all carbon emissions, with all the revenue rebated directly to the American people. A family of four would receive approximately $2,000 per year in &#8220;carbon dividends.&#8221;
The Baker-Shultz Carbon Dividends plan—starting with a carbon fee of $40 per ton—would be the most ambitious carbon price enacted by any major emitter nation.
A report entitled <a href="http://www.clcouncil.org/exceedingparis">Exceeding Paris</a>, released today by the Climate Leadership Council, quantifies the emissions reductions that could reasonably be expected. Its foreword is co-authored by former Secretary of State George Shultz, former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers, former EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman, and former <a href="https://fortune.com/company/walmart/" target="_blank">Walmart</a> Chairman Rob Walton, as well as the two of us.
All Obama-era climate regulations, had they remained in place, would have achieved approximately 18% in greenhouse gas reductions by 2025, according to the council&#8217;s analysis. In comparison, the Baker-Shultz plan would achieve an approximately 32% reduction by 2025, thereby exceeding our Paris commitment by a wide margin.
As also discussed in our report, the nonprofit research organization Resources for the Future modeled the Baker-Shultz plan through 2035 based on a carbon tax starting in 2021 and a range of inflation-adjusted annual escalation rates from 3% to 6%. It found that U.S. energy-related CO2 emissions would decline to a level of 41% to 47% below 2005 levels by 2035, also raising the environmental bar substantially.
It&#8217;s clear that the Baker-Shultz Carbon Dividends Plan is the most environmentally ambitious climate solution. It&#8217;s also the most politically viable because it addresses the legitimate concerns of all key stakeholders in the climate debate and enables each to realize an important victory.
A broad coalition of business sector leaders supports the general outlines of the plan. Among them: <a href="https://fortune.com/company/bp/" target="_blank">BP</a>, ExxonMobil, Shell, and <a href="https://fortune.com/company/total/" target="_blank">Total</a>, as well as <a href="https://fortune.com/company/aecom/" target="_blank">AECOM</a>, Allianz, <a href="https://fortune.com/company/att/" target="_blank">AT&amp;T</a>, <a href="https://fortune.com/company/exelon/" target="_blank">Exelon</a>, First Solar, <a href="https://fortune.com/company/general-motors/" target="_blank">General Motors</a>, <a href="https://fortune.com/company/johnson-johnson/" target="_blank">Johnson &amp; Johnson</a>, Metlife, <a href="https://fortune.com/company/procter-gamble/" target="_blank">Procter &amp; Gamble</a>, <a href="https://fortune.com/company/pepsico/" target="_blank">PepsiCo</a>, Santander, Schneider Electric, and <a href="https://fortune.com/company/unilever/" target="_blank">Unilever</a>. Each is a <a href="https://www.clcouncil.org/founding-members/">founding member</a> of the Climate Leadership Council.
The Baker-Shultz framework also enjoys support from environmental organizations and opinion leaders from across the political spectrum. This is the broadest coalition in U.S. history to come together in support of a concrete federal climate solution, and it continues to grow.
The plan’s broad appeal is based on a series of grand bargains, including trading a robust and rising carbon price for regulatory relief, thereby appealing to environmentalists, businesses, and conservatives at the same time. Just as important, it appeals to the American people by rebating all of the revenue raised directly to them in an equal per capita amount. This would allow the majority of American families to economically benefit from helping solve climate change.
At the heart of this grand bargain is the environmental ambition of the Baker-Shultz plan, which unlocks the political viability of its other components. Its effectiveness in reducing emissions justifies the phase-out of other carbon regulations that are far more intrusive. This provides a major draw for businesses. The plan&#8217;s reliance on a market-based carbon tax also makes it—in the view of economists of all stripes—the most cost-effective solution.
To ensure that intended emissions reductions are met, the Baker-Shultz plan may include an environmental assurance mechanism under which the carbon fee would increase faster if key emissions reductions benchmarks are not met. And to protect the international competitiveness of American firms, it includes a border carbon adjustment.
The plan&#8217;s popularity enhances its viability. A <a href="http://www.clcouncil.org/polling_sep2018">national poll</a> by Hill+Knowlton, released in full today, finds that the American public supports the Baker-Shultz plan by a 2-1 margin, and by a 23-point margin among Republicans. Among millennials—soon to be the largest voting cohort—support exceeds 4-1.
All of this suggests that the Baker-Shultz plan is emerging as a consensus national climate solution, reflecting the sensible center of American politics. It also demonstrates that there is a realistic path for the United States to exceed its Paris climate commitment and restore its position as a global climate leader.
Janet L. Yellen is the former Chair of the Federal Reserve. Ted Halstead is Chairman &amp; CEO of the Climate Leadership Council.</div>

Janet Yellen and Ted Halstead: The Baker-Shultz plan is a breakthrough climate proposal that corporations and conservatives can love.

The Most Ambitious Climate Plan In History

An industrial smokestack in silhouette in Zhangjiakou, Hebei, China.

legacy

Environment

Commentary

The Baker-Shultz plan is a breakthrough climate proposal that corporations and conservatives can love, Janet Yellen and Ted Halstead write.

The Most Ambitious Climate Plan In History | Fortune

Steve Zatz

Stop blaming the loneliness epidemic on social media—digital communities help more than they hurt

/2025/02/26/loneliness-epidemic-social-media-digital-health/

David B. Yoffie

Reed Hundt

Charlene Barshefsky

James Plummer

Trump wants TSMC to take over Intel’s plants. That’s a terrible idea—here’s what needs to happen instead

/2025/02/26/trump-intel-tsmc-semiconductors/

Keith Dixon

Keith Dixon says the big problem with employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) is that there aren't enough of them.

I was sleeping in a Walmart parking lot. Now I own a company

/2025/02/26/employee-owned-companies-careers-benefits-esops/

Anu Madgavkar

Sven Smit

The gender pay gap has narrowed but is still a big problem.

The gender pay gap is real—but maybe not for the reasons you think

/2025/02/26/gender-pay-gap-careers-workplace/

Rebecca Willett

Henry Hoffmann

The recent and upcoming cuts to federal research spending pose a grave threat U.S. AI leadership.

Federal budget cuts threaten to decimate America’s AI superiority—and other countries are watching

/2025/02/25/federal-budget-cuts-threaten-america-ai-tech-superiority/

Antoine Rostand

Trump’s return is breaking climate policy—and that may be a good thing

/2025/02/25/trump-environment-climate-regulation/

Marco Quiroz-Gutierrez

Berkshire Hathaway paid the biggest tax bill in history last year, and Warren Buffett wants the government to ‘spend it wisely’ on burdened Americans

https://fortune.com/2025/02/25/berkshire-hathaway-taxes-warren-buffett/?itm_source=parsely-api

Eleanor Pringle

President Trump says U.S. can pay off $36 trillion debt by selling wealthy immigrants $5 million ‘gold card’ visas and eventual citizenship

https://fortune.com/2025/02/26/trump-gold-card-visa-national-debt-plan/?itm_source=parsely-api

Jeremy Kahn

The $19.6 billion pivot: How OpenAI's 2-year struggle to launch GPT-5 revealed that its core AI strategy has stopped working

https://fortune.com/2025/02/25/what-happened-gpt-5-openai-orion-pivot-scaling-pre-training-llm-agi-reasoning/?itm_source=parsely-api

Tokyo is turning to a 4-day workweek in a desperate attempt to help Japan shed its unwanted title of 'world’s oldest population'

https://fortune.com/article/tokyo-4-day-workweek-desperate-attempt-japan-shed-title-worlds-oldest-population/?itm_source=parsely-api

Sydney Lake

Home Depot exec says Americans may soon embrace sky-high mortgage rates as 'the new normal' and invest in housing anyway

https://fortune.com/2025/02/25/home-depot-high-mortgage-rates-new-normal-housing-richard-mcphail-ted-decker/?itm_source=parsely-api

Steve Jobs didn’t take Warren Buffett’s financial advice to buy back Apple stock, and it says a lot about his leadership style

https://fortune.com/2025/02/24/steve-jobs-didnt-take-warren-buffett-financial-advice-leadership-style/?itm_source=parsely-api