I’d wager that the WSJ is correct, both on the individual and the timing.

As for Grey, his ascension at Blackstone isn’t exactly breaking news. Nearly two years ago, The Financial Times wrote something very close to what the WSJ published yesterday. And, since then, Tony James himself has noted that Grey’s success has helped transform Blackstone from a private equity firm that does real estate into a real estate firm that does private equity.

As for the timing, there continue to be widespread speculation — both inside Blackstone and in private equity circles — that James would be willing to leave Blackstone if the right offer comes along. Not for another investment job, but rather for something either in government (James was a big Obama supporter) or in the nonprofit world. Some of that talk was heightened last fall, when James said during an interview that “if I felt I could do something good for the world, I might consider that.”

For now, however, Blackstone’s succession plan remains just that. A plan. Kind of like it was two years ago. What we’ve learned this week isn’t so much something new, so much as that nothing’s changed.

Sign up for Dan Primack’s daily email newsletter on deals and deal-makers: GetTermSheet.com