• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
LeadershipPolitics

Trump’s EPA Budget Requests Added Protections—For Scott Pruitt

By
Feliz Solomon
Feliz Solomon
By
Feliz Solomon
Feliz Solomon
April 13, 2017, 4:05 AM ET

The Trump administration has requested sweeping budget cuts for the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), though it has asked Congress to beef up protection for at least one part of it.

A new EPA budget proposal, obtained by the Washington Post, calls for 10 new full-time security personnel to staff a round-the-clock detail for EPA administrator Scott Pruitt—an unprecedented level of protection for his position.

The Post reports that the proposed budget would slash some 30% of the agency’s funds, affecting dozens of programs and thousands of employees. Among the programs likely to be refunded are climate-change research and environmental cleanup efforts.

According to the Post, it isn’t clear whether Pruitt himself requested the added security. A leader of Trump’s EPA transition team, Myron Ebell, said earlier this year, however, that it could be a wise move given the resistance to Pruitt, even from within his own agency.

Speaking with environmental news site E&E in February, Ebell said protecting Pruitt would be “prudent given the continuing activities by the left to foment hatred, and the reported hostility within the agency from some unprofessional activists.”

For more on Scott Pruitt, watch Fortune’s video:

Since his nomination in December, Pruitt has faced unprecedented opposition for someone seeking the role of the national environmental caretaker. While he said during his confirmation hearings that he, unlike the position offered by Trump, does not believe that climate change is a “hoax,” he would not concede that global environmental change was caused by humans.

He has also been criticized for suing the very agency he sought to lead more than a dozen times during his former role as Attorney General of oil-producer Oklahoma. His legal attacks prompted nearly 800 EPA employees to urge Senate members to block his confirmation, arguing that he had “shown no interest” in enforcing the environmental laws and principles that underpin the agency’s purpose.

About the Author
By Feliz Solomon
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.