• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
FinanceLinkedIn

Was Someone Tipped Off To The LinkedIn Sale?

By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
and
Stephen Gandel
Stephen Gandel
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Dan Primack
Dan Primack
and
Stephen Gandel
Stephen Gandel
Down Arrow Button Icon
June 13, 2016, 12:14 PM ET

When LinkedIn (LNKD) announced this morning that it would be acquired for $26.2 billion by Microsoft (MSFT), the entire tech and business press seemed caught off guard. There had been no rumors circulating about such a deal, nor was there even a strategic Sunday night media leak. Moreover, the company’s share price actually fell last Friday by a few dollars per share (closing 49.53% below Microsoft’s $196 per share offer).

But it does appear that someone might have known what was coming.

Fortune has examined options contract records for LinkedIn, and discovered unusually high trading volume last Friday.

One of the LinkedIn options is a call with a strike price of $160 per share, which is the price at which an option starts to make money, that matures on August 19. They first began trading on Feb. 5, which also represented the day with the most contracts sold, at 121 (the only day of triple-digit action). Well, until last Friday when a whopping 621 contracts were traded.

There also is a $175 per share option that had 331 contracts moved last Friday. That also represents an all-time high, although there also was an unusually-strong action the day before (116 contracts traded) and on May 11 (314 traded).

It is, of course, possible that last Friday’s buyer (or buyers?) simply had remarkably fortunate timing. Just how lucky? According to data from Bloomberg, 600 options to buy LinkedIn shares at $160 were bought in two trades on Friday afternoon for a total of $135,100. Those same options are now worth just over $2 million, for a less than one trading day profit of nearly $1.9 million.

Also on Friday, 300 options to buy LinkedIn shares at $175 were bought in four trades. Those options cost $25,000. They are now worth $569,100, a gain of 2176% in less than one trading day. Another red flag: All of the $175 call options were bought in the last five minutes of trading on Friday.

That’s some very well timed trades. A more likely scenario, of course, is that someone in the market had an inkling of what was coming.

If this is indeed a case of insider trading, it would hardly be the first time that options trading was the first giveaway. Back in 2011, for example, unusual options trading preceded Hewlett-Packard’s purchase of 3Com, ultimately leading to insider trading charges against a hedge fund manager.

An options trader who viewed the data compiled by Fortune said that it likely is too small for an institutional buyer, suggesting an individual trader is more likely.

What’s more, by mid-after a number of traders who normally flag questionable options trades were saying that these trades may have been less nefarious than they looked at first.

@stephengandel – Might want to look more closely, was part of an Iron Condor, and trade actually is down pic.twitter.com/I9QpYHYXRj

— Joe Kunkle (@OptionsHawk) June 13, 2016

It appears at the same time the LinkedIn call options were bought, put options were bought as well. It’s not definite they were bought by the same trader, but if there were it could have been part of a hedging strategy, and the losses from the puts could offset what the person stood to make on the so-called out-of-the-money call trade, suggesting who ever made the trade didn’t really know a deal was happening.

However, even if the put was meant to hedge the call option, it appears whoever put on these trades stood to make more money if LinkedIn’s shares took off, perhaps because of an acquisition, which is what happened. For instance, 667 put contracts were bought on Friday at a strike price of $125, meaning the trade would make money if LinkedIn’s stock price fell below $125. Those put options cost $506,920. The options are now essentially worthless, trading at $0.10 per contract on Monday, for a total of $6,670. But even if you factor in the $500,000 loss from the put position, the trader who bought the $160 calls still made a heck of a lot of money, roughly $1.4 million.

On top of that, the trades from last Friday were not the only questionable action in LinkedIn’s shares. On May 31, someone bought 2502 options to buy LinkedIn shares for a strike price of $180, which at the time was $53 higher than where LinkedIn’s shares were trading at the time. The options, which are set to expire in November and don’t appear to have been sold, cost $835,668. Today they are worth just over $3.5 million.

And unlike the other trade there does not seem to be an offsetting put purchase. So that’s $2.7 million in pure profit, minus of course legal fees.

About the Authors
By Dan Primack
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
By Stephen Gandel
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Finance

InvestingSports
Big 12 in advanced talks for deal with RedBird-backed fund
By Giles Turner and BloombergDecember 13, 2025
2 hours ago
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez often praises the financial and social benefits that immigrants bring to the country.
EuropeSpain
In a continent cracking down on immigration and berated by Trump’s warnings of ‘civilizational erasure,’ Spain embraces migrants
By Suman Naishadham and The Associated PressDecember 13, 2025
4 hours ago
EconomyAgriculture
More financially distressed farmers are expected to lose their property soon as loan repayments and incomes continue to falter
By Jason MaDecember 13, 2025
5 hours ago
InvestingStock
There have been head fakes before, but this time may be different as the latest stock rotation out of AI is just getting started, analysts say
By Jason MaDecember 13, 2025
8 hours ago
Politicsdavid sacks
Can there be competency without conflict in Washington?
By Alyson ShontellDecember 13, 2025
8 hours ago
Investingspace
SpaceX sets $800 billion valuation, confirms 2026 IPO plans
By Loren Grush, Edward Ludlow and BloombergDecember 13, 2025
9 hours ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs are taxes and they were used to finance the federal government until the 1913 income tax. A top economist breaks it down
By Kent JonesDecember 12, 2025
2 days ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple cofounder Ronald Wayne sold his 10% stake for $800 in 1976—today it’d be worth up to $400 billion
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The Fed just ‘Trump-proofed’ itself with a unanimous move to preempt a potential leadership shake-up
By Jason MaDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
For the first time since Trump’s tariff rollout, import tax revenue has fallen, threatening his lofty plans to slash the $38 trillion national debt
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple CEO Tim Cook out-earns the average American’s salary in just 7 hours—to put that into context, he could buy a new $439,000 home in just 2 days
By Emma BurleighDecember 12, 2025
1 day ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.