• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Health

The White House Has Rejected a Controversial Way to Fight High Drug Prices

By
Sy Mukherjee
Sy Mukherjee
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Sy Mukherjee
Sy Mukherjee
Down Arrow Button Icon
March 9, 2016, 1:35 PM ET
Drugs From European Pharmaceuticals Companies As Stocks Outperformed The Stoxx 600 Index By 1.2 percentage Points
A pharmacist looks for medication on a pharmacy's shelves in London, U.K., on Monday, Dec. 14, 2015. European pharmaceuticals stocks in 2015 have outperformed the Stoxx 600 Index by 1.2 percentage points in U.S. dollar terms. Photographer: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty ImagesPhotograph by Simon Dawson — Bloomberg via Getty Images

The Obama Administration is reportedly pushing back on a controversial request by House Democrats to facilitate broader use of so-called march-in rights to nix drug patents as a way to fight steep medication price increases.

The Hill reports that Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Burwell responded to a January letter from Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) and more than 50 of his fellow Democrats by asserting that the existing criteria on march-in rights “are sufficiently clear” and that adding more regulatory guidance which targets drug prices “is not needed.”

She also noted that the NIH has previously mulled using the march-in clause and decided against it.

Although Burwell didn’t entirely rule out the extraordinary measures, she made clear that any action would have to be applied on a “strictly limited” case-by-case basis.

The lawmakers had hoped issuing more detailed guidance on march-in rights would serve as a warning shot across the bow of pharmaceutical companies in a year when drug pricing is under the microscope.

In addition to pharma industry attacks by Democrats Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, GOP frontrunner Donald Trump has promised to negotiate drug prices down to zero while Florida Sen. Marco Rubio has referred to some drugmakers’ actions as “pure profiteering.” Pharma firms have hit back by arguing the hikes help fund R&D.

Fortune has reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services and Rep. Doggett and will update this story if they respond.

About the Author
By Sy Mukherjee
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.