• Home
  • Latest
  • Fortune 500
  • Finance
  • Tech
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia
Arts & Entertainment

Why the Academy Keeps Giving Oscars to Movies No One Sees

By
Chris Lee
Chris Lee
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Chris Lee
Chris Lee
Down Arrow Button Icon
February 29, 2016, 3:47 PM ET
Photograph by Kerry Hayes — Open Road Films

“It was completely surprising,” Spotlight producer Michael Sugar told reporters after his film claimed the Academy award for Best Picture on Sunday.

Spotlight, an investigative journalism biopic, had trailed Leonardo DiCaprio’s survival drama The Revenant and the Gold Derby odds-on favoriteThe Big Short in awards season handicapping for the last three months.

And Spotlight hadn’t done so well at the box office, either, taking in a mere $39 million domestically. Compare that to Mad Max: Fury Road ($153 million), The Revenant ($170 million) and The Martian ($228 million).

Favoring the obscure

But the win serves to expose a larger pattern of Oscar voting: bigger is seldom better when it comes to landing best picture. In recent years, the statuette has gone home with lesser-seen movies, often from off the mainstream radar — offbeat or “prestige” titles that captured the imagination of Academy voters if not the American public — to the near-total exclusion of big budget Hollywood blockbusters.

“What the hell is that?”

Oscars host Chris Rock poked fun at the divide between prestige movies and mainstream tastes during the show. During one segment, he polled black moviegoers in Compton — “I went as far away from Hollywood as I could!” Rock joked — about their familiarity with the best picture nominees.

“So did you see any of the Oscar-nominated movies? Did you see Spotlight?” Rock asks one passerby standing in front of the multiplex.

“No,” the man replies, looking perplexed. “What the hell is that? No, I didn’t see that movie.”

‘Best Pictures’ often are seen by few

At this point, it’s been more than a dozen years since a certifiable blockbuster won best picture. In 2003, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King became the rare popcorn event film to achieve mass appeal, earning $377 million in its theatrical run, and also emerge with the year’s top Oscar honor.

In more recent years, the Best Picture award has gone to the esoteric or prestige film.

  • In 2006, Crash, a film with just $70.6 million gross, beat out blockbuster Brokeback Mountain ($105 million).
  • In 2011, The Artist ($46.8 million), a silent film made in black-and-white, claimed the prize against The Help ($177.5 million).
  • In 2014, 12 Years a Slave ($57 million), a wrenching film about slavery with no marquee name actors, vanquished Gravity ($270 million), which starred Sandra Bullock and George Clooney.

Last year director Alejandro Gonzalez-Inarritu’s Birdman arrived as one of the lowest grossing best picture winners in history with only $37 million in domestic ticket sales at the time while its competition, Clint Eastwood’s American Sniper, had earned $320 million by February 2015.

And remember Avatar?

In perhaps the most notorious example of Oscar’s underdog favoritism, in 2010, The Hurt Locker — released on just 535 screens and tallying less than $19 million at the box office — beat Avatar which had grossed $760 million and was well on its way to becoming the most successful movie ever made.

Now, The Hurt Locker stands as the lowest-grossing best picture winner on record. (Note: all figures are domestic totals adjusted for ticket price inflation, using boxofficemojo.com.)

This year, the divide between the films moviegoers have actually seen and the kind of prestige titles Oscar voters tend to favor became even more pronounced with the modestly budgeted best picture nominees Room and Brooklyn combining to gross just $48 million domestically.

Smaller films, fewer viewers?

One possible side effect of the Academy’s tendency to prefer smaller, more exquisite films over splashy popcorn titles has been on ratings for the Oscars broadcast. On Sunday, audiences tuning in for ABC’s awards telecast plummeted to somewhere around 34 million viewers, according to Nielsen ratings tabulated from the country’s 56 largest cities — the show’s lowest marketshare in eight years.

Even more damning to the show’s currency, ratings slumped 5% in the 18-to-49 demographic year over year: a significant exodus of younger viewers.

Asked about Spotlight‘s come-from-behind victory against The Revenant, one of the journalism drama’s producers, Blye Pagon Faust, acknowledged the Academy had given a big win to the smaller movie.

“The members recognized the import of this film,” Faust said. “That speaks volumes of this filmmaking community.”

The ratings, however, dictate that spotlight on Spotlight, however, isn’t as big as it used to be.

Chris Lee is a former staff writer for Entertainment Weekly, The Los Angeles Times, Newsweek and The Daily Beast. He covers entertainment, culture and business in Los Angeles.

About the Author
By Chris Lee
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon

Latest in Arts & Entertainment

Sarandos
CommentaryAntitrust
Netflix, Warner, Paramount and antitrust: Entertainment megadeal’s outcome must follow the evidence, not politics or fear of integration
By Satya MararDecember 12, 2025
20 hours ago
Sam Altman
Arts & EntertainmentMedia
‘We’re not just going to want to be fed AI slop for 16 hours a day’: Analyst sees Disney/OpenAI deal as a dividing line in entertainment history
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 11, 2025
1 day ago
Iger
AIDisney
‘Creativity is the new productivity’: Bob Iger on why Disney chose to be ‘aggressive,’ adding OpenAI as a $1 billion partner
By Nick LichtenbergDecember 11, 2025
2 days ago
Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, speaks to the media as he arrives at the Sun Valley Lodge for the Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference on July 11, 2023 in Sun Valley, Idaho.
AIOpenAI
OpenAI and Disney just ended the ‘war’ between AI and Hollywood with their $1 billion Sora deal—and OpenAI made itself ‘indispensable,’ expert says
By Eva RoytburgDecember 11, 2025
2 days ago
AIOpenAI
Bob Iger says Disney’s $1 billion deal with OpenAI is an ‘opportunity, not a threat’: ‘We’d rather participate than be disrupted by it’
By Marco Quiroz-GutierrezDecember 11, 2025
2 days ago
Sarandos
CommentaryAntitrust
Netflix’s takeover of Warner Brothers is a nightmare for consumers
By Ike BrannonDecember 11, 2025
2 days ago

Most Popular

placeholder alt text
Economy
Tariffs are taxes and they were used to finance the federal government until the 1913 income tax. A top economist breaks it down
By Kent JonesDecember 12, 2025
22 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
Apple cofounder Ronald Wayne sold his 10% stake for $800 in 1976—today it’d be worth up to $400 billion
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
18 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
40% of Stanford undergrads receive disability accommodations—but it’s become a college-wide phenomenon as Gen Z try to succeed in the current climate
By Preston ForeDecember 12, 2025
17 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Success
At 18, doctors gave him three hours to live. He played video games from his hospital bed—and now, he’s built a $10 million-a-year video game studio
By Preston ForeDecember 10, 2025
3 days ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
For the first time since Trump’s tariff rollout, import tax revenue has fallen, threatening his lofty plans to slash the $38 trillion national debt
By Sasha RogelbergDecember 12, 2025
13 hours ago
placeholder alt text
Economy
The Fed just ‘Trump-proofed’ itself with a unanimous move to preempt a potential leadership shake-up
By Jason MaDecember 12, 2025
11 hours ago
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.