• Home
  • News
  • Fortune 500
  • Tech
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Lifestyle
  • Rankings
  • Multimedia

Steve Jobs wins approval to raze his old mansion

By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
By
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Philip Elmer-DeWitt
Down Arrow Button Icon
May 13, 2009, 6:34 AM ET

Unless preservationists make a last-ditch effort to save it, a 14-bedroom house built by a copper millionaire during the Coolidge administration will be torn down by a computer billionaire in the age of Obama.

At a public hearing Tuesday night, the town council of Woodside, Calif. — one of the wealthiest small towns in America — voted 6 to 1 to approve a controversial demolition permit that would allow Apple (AAPL) CEO Steve Jobs to knock down a 17,250 square foot Spanish colonial mansion and replace it with a smaller, more environmentally friendly home.

“
I love old Spanish revival homes — I have a couple of them myself, and I’ve restored them,” council member Dave Tanner said at the meeting, according to a report in the Palo Alto Daily News.

“I didn’t see any reason to try to restore or maintain this house.”


Jobs bought the sprawling mansion known as the Jackling House in 1984 — the year the Mac came out — and camped out in it for about 10 years before moving to Palo Alto. His 2004 demolition permit was approved by the Woodside town council but blocked by an ad-hoc group called Uphold Our Heritage. They view the abandoned structure — built in 1925 by
George Washington Smith
in his Santa Barbara style for copper mining magnate
Daniel C. Jackling
— as a national treasure.


At Tuesday’s meeting, Mayor

Peter Mason, a licensed architect, cast the sole vote opposing demolition.

“It’s an unfortunate thing that Mr. Jobs doesn’t like the house,” Mason told the Daily News.  “It’s really sad that we’re going to continue to tear down historic resources in this town because they’re old.”

Asked by the paper whether she planned to pursue further legal action, Uphold Our Heritage president Clotilda Luce gave an ambiguous answer. “We already sued, and we won,” she said. “I wish (the council) had paid attention to the law.”

Photo by Jonathan Haeber posted with permission. For more of his work, click here and here.

See also:

  • Inside Steve Jobs’ tear-down mansion
  • Lawyer: Steve Jobs too weak to attend long town meeting
About the Author
By Philip Elmer-DeWitt
See full bioRight Arrow Button Icon
Rankings
  • 100 Best Companies
  • Fortune 500
  • Global 500
  • Fortune 500 Europe
  • Most Powerful Women
  • Future 50
  • World’s Most Admired Companies
  • See All Rankings
Sections
  • Finance
  • Leadership
  • Success
  • Tech
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Environment
  • Fortune Crypto
  • Health
  • Retail
  • Lifestyle
  • Politics
  • Newsletters
  • Magazine
  • Features
  • Commentary
  • Mpw
  • CEO Initiative
  • Conferences
  • Personal Finance
  • Education
Customer Support
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Customer Service Portal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms Of Use
  • Single Issues For Purchase
  • International Print
Commercial Services
  • Advertising
  • Fortune Brand Studio
  • Fortune Analytics
  • Fortune Conferences
  • Business Development
About Us
  • About Us
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Press Center
  • Work At Fortune
  • Diversity And Inclusion
  • Terms And Conditions
  • Site Map

© 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.